Laserfiche WebLink
127 <br />Stormwater Base Rate Cate�orv <br />Single-Family Residential & Duplex <br />Multi-Family & Churcl�es <br />Cemeteries & Golf Course <br />Parks <br />Schools & Community Centers <br />Commercial & Industrial <br />zois <br />Rate <br />$ 12.00 <br />92.75 <br />930 <br />27.90 <br />46.45 <br />l 83.65 <br />Rates for single-family are per housing unit; all others are per acre <br />Recycling Rate Cate�orv <br />Single-Family <br />Multi-Family <br />ao16 <br />Rate <br />$ 12.35 <br />95.55 <br />930 <br />28.75 <br />46.45 <br />191.00 <br />2015 2016 <br />Rate Rate <br />$ 5.50 $ 5.60 <br />5.50 5.60 <br />Comments <br />Standard SF rate <br />Standa�-d SF rate x 7.75 <br />Standard SF rate x 0.75 <br />Standard SF rate x 2.3 5 <br />Standard SF rate x 3.75 <br />Standard SF rate x 15.50 <br />Comments <br />Standard rate <br />Standard rate <br />Water Usage History <br />The series of graphs presented below depict water customer consumption patterns over the past 8 years <br />beginning with a depiction of the citywide water consumption. <br />1 <br />Citywide Water Usage (000's gals.) <br />As indicated in the graph, citywide consumption has generally been falling over the past 8 years — a <br />21% reduction since 2007. With aggregate data it's difficult to conclude whether water customers are <br />modifying their behavior or if the volume is decreasing for other reasons such as the loss of high-water <br />users (manufacturing, hotels, apartments, etc.) or higher summertime rainfall totals. <br />As we'll discuss further below, the average monthly summertime rainfall totals have increased <br />somewhat since 2009, however during this same period the City has seen growth in housing units, retail <br />establishments, and other commercial uses. The bottom line is that overall consumption has declined, <br />while the City has grown. <br />The next graph depicts the average quarterlX wintertime usage for single-family homes. <br />Page 6 of 14 <br />