My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2015_1130_CCpacket
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2015
>
2015_1130_CCpacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/21/2015 3:05:31 PM
Creation date
11/25/2015 3:11:48 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
244
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� As is shown in this graph, when looking at more comprehensive comparison that factors in a broader <br />z spectrum of needs and funding philosophies, Roseville has one of the lowest financial impacts on <br />z��� residents of the comparison group — approximately 13% below the peer average. Once again, we must <br />z� also look at other factors and local preferences to determine whether there are other influences affecting <br />� � property taxes and rates. <br />z�� � Staff will be available at the Commission meeting to address any inquiries. <br />�: <br />� POLICY OBJECTIVE <br />�� An annual review of the City's utility rate structure is consistent with governmental best practices to <br />��� ensure that each utility operation is financially sound. <br />FINANCIAL IMPACTS <br />See above. <br />STAFF RECOMMENDATION <br />�� Based on the increasing costs noted above, Staff is recommending rate adjustments as shown in the <br />�_ attached resolution. <br />_ REQUESTED COUNCIL ACTION <br />_� The Council is asked to consider adopting the attached resolution establishing the 2016 Utility Rates. <br />Prepared by: Chris Miller, Finance Director <br />Attachments: A: Resolution establishing the 2016 Utility Rates <br />Page 11 of 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.