Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />Option #3: too small, drastic change on service level <br />o <br /> <br /> <br />Holt reiterated that when we start reducing the size of the clubhouse we impact operations. <br /> <br /> <br />O’Brien commented that she would hate to see Roseville shrink its vision and build <br />something that does not meet current needs. <br /> <br /> <br />Brokke talked about the possibility of considering the Historical Society need for a <br />permanent home. Would a shared facility with the Golf Course make sense/work? <br /> <br />Gelbach asked if the Council has identified funding for a Historical Society facility. <br />o <br /> <br />Staff responded that nothing has been identified at this time. <br />o <br /> <br /> <br />Stoner wrapped up the discussion by recommending that the Commission’s plan when <br />talking with the Council should be a recommendation for Option #1 and a comment that <br />Option #4 is not recommended. <br /> <br /> DISCUSS CITY COUNCIL JOINT MEETING <br />5. <br />The joint meeting with the Council is scheduled for Monday, November 16. <br /> <br /> <br />Commissioners suggested the two agenda items be switched so that the joint meeting starts <br />with a discussion of the Park Dedication Use of Funds Policy and end with a discussion on <br />Cedarholm Golf Course improvements. <br /> <br /> <br />Brokke mentioned that the Finance Commission has yet to meet this month so there <br />recommendations/suggestions are not yet finalized but we have heard that; <br /> <br />The Finance Commission feels $800,000 is appropriate, rather than the $1M the Parks <br />o <br />& Recreation Commission is suggesting. <br /> <br />The Finance Commission feels the 2/3, 1/3 split is appropriate but that there should <br />o <br />be no adjustments if the land acquisition fund balance dips below the stated minimum <br />balance. <br /> <br /> <br />Commissioners decided that all in attendance would participate in the discussions with the <br />Council and that Stoner will take the lead on the Park Dedication topic and Holt & Gelbach <br />will take the lead on the Cedarholm discussion. <br /> <br /> FEE DISCUSSION <br />6. <br />Anfang highlighted portions of the Parks & Recreation Fee report for the Commission. <br /> <br /> <br />The Cost Recovery Methodology is a nationally recognized system for categorizing fees <br />based on individual community’s values and interests. <br /> <br /> <br />The fee structure for recreation programs and facilities in many instances cover more than <br />direct costs, they also support administrative costs and liability insurance costs. <br /> <br /> <br />Non-resident fees provide Roseville residents with expanded and enhanced opportunities. <br />Commissioners commented on the expanse and significance of the fees generated by all divisions <br />within the Parks & Recreation department. <br /> <br /> STAFF REPORT <br />7. <br />Brokke spoke of: <br /> <br /> <br />OVAL opening delayed 24 hours due to the warm fall we have had. OVAL officially opens on <br />Saturday, November 7. <br /> <br /> <br />OVALuminations has been postponed to November 20. <br /> <br /> <br />The 2016 Commission calendar has been included in tonight’s packet. <br /> <br /> <br />The Upper Villa Stormwater Retention Project has started. <br /> <br /> <br />Met Council is planning a Sanitary Sewer Lining project for 2016 that could have impacts on <br />Valley and Villa Parks. <br /> <br /> <br />Central Park Foundation contributed $80,000 to the recently installed playground in Central <br />Park, adjacent to the Foundation Shelter. This additional funding helped expand the play <br />structure and make it more accessible. <br /> <br />