Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, November 30, 2015 <br />Page 33 <br />Councilmember Laliberte stated, at this point, she thought the CEC was finding <br />its way as a new CEC; and noted the City Council's original intent was clearly de- <br />fined in the CEC's charge in their enabling ordinance. While considering that sta- <br />tus, Councilmember Laliberte did not that the one thing the City Council had spe- <br />cifically asked the CEC to work on was the comprehensive plan update process <br />and to bring specific recommendations back for that process, a very important <br />piece for them to provide advice on. Councilmember Laliberte stated she was <br />looking forward to the CEC completing some of their preliininary work and ad- <br />dress that important issue. From her observation of the CEC meetings to-date, <br />Councilmember Laliberte noted some conversations about planning or hosting <br />some events to make recommendation to the City Cou�tcil on how they should be <br />done; and advised that was an area of concern that there may be some overlap oc- <br />curring between the HRC and CEC, with planning events or programs part of the <br />same group or an off-shoot and not yet taking place. Councilmember Laliberte <br />noted the importance to check-in and make sure those efforts were not being du- <br />plicated. <br />_. <br />Mayar Roe agreed that made sense. <br />Councilmember McGehee agreed with Councilmember Laliberte and specific as- <br />signments, such as the process of engagement or the comprehensive plan update <br />process as something the City Council could use help with, noting that was a big <br />topic coming up in the very near future, with many options of how best to do han- <br />dle the process. Councilmember McGehee stated the need to be clear that the <br />City Council expected a periodic check-in for at least those two very specific <br />charged when �rst enabling the CEC. While agreeing with Councilmember <br />Laliberte that the CEC is still finding its way, Councilmember McGehee stated <br />the City Council needed to mark the pathway more clearly to facilitate their ef- <br />forts. <br />Mayor Roe agreed that was well-stated by Councilmember McGehee, and noted <br />the CEC had also been charged with observing the SE Roseville process and how <br />� to engage people in that. Mayor Roe suggested perhaps an early 2016 joint meet- <br />ing and presentation by the CEC of their respective work plan was needed to pro- <br />� � vide that check-in. <br />Councilmember McGehee noted part of the human rights is the diverse communi- <br />ty piece, not just community engagement. <br />Mayor Roe opined that the difference was human rights not looking specifically <br />to engage people in city activities, but viewing the broader community. <br />Mayor Roe reiterated the next step to schedule a joint meeting early in 2016. <br />