My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016_0104_CCPacket
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2016
>
2016_0104_CCPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/8/2016 3:42:16 PM
Creation date
12/31/2015 2:07:38 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
108
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RCA Exhibit A <br />10 � provided rationale in routing the water to Acorn Road to help the volume of water flowing in to the <br />102 southwest portion of the property; and with this iteration, water would leave the site very slowly and <br />103 infiltrate into the drainage tile system, connecting to an 8" pipe and downstream into that underground <br />104 system to Acorn Road. Mr. Plowe advised that the City Engineer had indicated there would be no <br />105 problem with this additional flow with existing stormwater management in the area. <br />106 Member Cunningham noted that one reason for previous proposals being ultimately denied by the City <br />107 Council was due to concerns with emergency vehicle access; and asked for comment on this latest <br />108 iteration without a cul-de-sac to facilitate that, as well as addressing whether or not widening the street to <br />1oG 32' would alleviate emergency vehicle access issues. <br />11G Mr. Plowe noted that, with this iteration, the road had been shortened 25' from the previously Planning <br />� � 7 Commission-approved development proposal, making the actual length of the street quite short. <br />112 City Planner Thomas Paschke clarified that concerns were raised by an individual Councilmember or from <br />11� area residents, he couldn't readily remember. However, Mr. Paschke noted that the Fire Department was <br />1 �� part of the DRC in reviewing any proposal, and had indicated no areas of concern. Mr. Paschke advised <br />1 � 5 that this private street would be similar to local streets having parking on both sides, traffic, and delivery <br />1 � 6 vehicles all having access, in addition to being able to accommodate emergency vehicle access. <br />117 At the request of Member Bull, Mr. Plowe advised that, while he didn't have actual impervious surface <br />11� calculations available for this iteration compared to previous proposals, impervious surfaces had been <br />119 reduced by eliminating one proposed building site and driveway, estimating that alone would reduce it by <br />12o approximately 1,000 feet. <br />12� Developer and Property Owner Art Mueller <br />12� Mr. Mueller stated that the road would now be so short it was shorter than his existing driveway. Mr. <br />12� Mueller opined that there should be no problems for delivery or emergency vehicles; and noted that due <br />12� to the short private road, residents would actually haul their garbage out to Acorn Road. <br />125 Public Comment <br />126 Mr. S. Ramalingam, 2182 Acorn Road <br />12i Mr. Ramalingam reviewed various elevations, gradients, and his calculations with the proposed grading <br />128 plan and stormwater basins; and potential impacts to Mr. Irv Cross's property on the east side. Mr. <br />12� Ramalingam further addressed the flow moving from this site to the 8" drain into Acorn Road <br />13o infrastructure, and questioned if it would be able to accommodate that additional flow, seeking further <br />13� evaluation by the City Engineer as to how many inches per hour it could accommodate. Mr. Ramalingam <br />132 asked staff to further evaluate the high water level on the western basin and surrounding area and height <br />133 differences. <br />13c+ Mr. Ramalingam noted that, once all the trees were removed as proposed, there would be no longer any <br />135 transpiration from the property, opining that 30-40% of the property's drainage today was handled by <br />� 3r those mature trees, and questioned how that would impact neighboring properties. <br />13� Member Murphy suggested the questions raised by Mr. Ramalingam would be most likely addressed by <br />13n the city's engineering staff. <br />13� Member Bull noted that engineered soils in the ponds should address that based on their understanding. <br />14G Mr. Ramalingam opined that engineers were addressing low, not high water levels; and groundwater was <br />14� an unknown in the equation. However, Mr. Ramalingam further opined that the grading plan indicated the <br />142 basins would be higher than Mr. Cross's property and the water had to go somewhere and based on his <br />143 calculations, it was currently going to the Cross property. <br />14�? Mr. Ramalingam further addressed the 32' width of Acorn Road with no parking, while this private street, <br />145 while short will have parking on both sides; and sought a guarantee that emergency vehicles would be <br />146 able to access properties or turn around. <br />14,� Janet Romanowski, 2195 Acorn Road <br />1�8 In listening to tonighYs conversation, Ms. Romanowski noted there still appeared to be problems with <br />,� drainage, then homeowner's association and tree removal, as well as the private road and parking and <br />Page 12 of 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.