2016_0104_CCPacket - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

RCA Exhibit A 2ou based on the information and analysis, and as conditioned and outlined in the project report dated 20 � December 2, 2015; amended to emphasize Condition D as follows: 202 "The applicant shall create and maintain a homeowner's association for the long-term 203 maintenance of the private infrastructure. All documents shall be reviewed and approved by the 20� City Attorney, Public Works Department, and Community Development Department. 20� Member Stellmach stated he found this latest proposal much improved from the last iteration; and 206 personally found three parcels and single-family homes a better fit for the neighborhood. Member 207 Stellmach expressed appreciation to Mr. Mueller for the additional drainage improvements and trees 208 remaining along Acorn Road. 20� 21G 211 212 21� 21 �E 215 21f 217 218 219 22C Based on previous discussion earlier tonight, Member Bull clarified that based on his understanding the emergency vehicle access concern had been brought up by the City Council as to stacking of vehicles on the private road as with the situation on any cul-de-sac. However, Member Bull noted that the Police and Fire Departments, in their review, had expressed no concern with that emergency vehicle access. Specific to tree preservation, Member Bull noted that the previous plan required 87 replacement trees, while this plan required zero replacements. Member Bull further noted that this plan provided 4,000 square feet less of impervious surface area allowing for better drainage. Therefore, Member Bull opined there were a lot of positives with this proposal compared to those in the past. Member Bull stated that his one remaining concern was with the potential responsibility the city may incur to maintain the basin in the southwest corner, noting that it also bisected two different property lines. Member Bull asked how those costs would be allocated when two different property owners were involved or how the city would access the properties if required to provide that maintenance. 22 � City Planner Paschke advised that all property owners would be assessed equally as they shared similar 222 burdens; and if the site had any drainage issues, all three sites would share equally in the resolution and 22: associated costs. 22� Regarding previous City Council comments, Member Bull stated that he shared their concerns about the 22� homeowner's association, and as noted in lines 113 and 121 of the staff report, he was unclear on the 226 term "long-term" maintenance, suggesting it needed to be "permanent" and "ongoing" by the association. 22� Therefore, Member Bull suggested changing that terminology in the Commission's motion and conditions. 22� With that amendment, Member Bull stated his support for that amended motion of approval. 22°� 230 231 232 233 Member Gitzen echoed the comments made by his colleagues, stating he found this iteration a vast improvement from the last one in lessening existing runoff as well as any new drainage. Member Gitzen spoke in support of the motion. Chair Boguszewski also agreed with his colleagues, and suggested revised terminology for Condition D to the makers of the motion, which they agreed with. 234 MOTION RESTATED AS REVISED 235 Member Murphy moved, seconded by Member Cunningham to recommend to the City Council 236 approval of the proposed PRELIMINARY PLAT of the property at 2201 Road; as detailed and 237 based on the information and analysis, and as conditioned and outlined in the project report dated 238 December 2, 2015; amended to emphasize Condition D as follows: 239 "The applicant shall create and maintain a homeowner's association for the �ler+g-�ex�n] 24cr �permanent and ongoing] maintenance of the private infrastructure. All documents shall be 241 reviewed and approved by the City Attorney, Public Works Department, and Community 242 Development Department." 243 Ayes:6 244 Nays:O 245 Motion carried. 246 247 248 21c For the benefit of the public, Member Murphy asked how questions were addressed and answers conveyed if unable to be answered tonight. Chair Boguszewski suggested it would be incumbent for staff or the City Council to address those issues before their subsequent approval. Page 14 of 15