Laserfiche WebLink
718 <br />719 <br />720 <br />721 <br />722 <br />723 <br />724 <br />725 <br />726 <br />727 <br />728 <br />729 <br />730 <br />731 <br />732 <br />733 <br />734 <br />735 <br />736 <br />737 <br />738 <br />739 <br />740 <br />741 <br />742 <br />743 <br />744 <br />745 <br />746 <br />747 <br />748 <br />749 <br />750 <br />751 <br />752 <br />753 <br />754 <br />755 <br />756 <br />757 <br />758 <br />759 <br />760 <br />761 <br />Chair Stenlund shared how much he valued the criteria and ranking values <br />applied to the last RFP in seeking education and other values, opining he <br />thought the Best Value Procurement process had been a marvelous experience. <br />Mr. Culver noted that the option for revenue sharing had been a profitable area <br />for most of the contract term until current market trends for recycling products <br />had taken a downturn. <br />In briefly reviewing some of those required issues under the purview of the <br />PWETC, Mr. Culver noted that annual MS4 public hearing, Pavement <br />Management Plan (PMP) update atermain replacements, sanitary sewer <br />lining, stormwater projects for approval in 2016 before presentation to the City <br />Council as examples of projects going into 2016. <br />Member Cihacek expressed interest in any captured savings from 2015 going <br />into 2016 (e.g. PMP, sealcoating, etc.). <br />Mr. Culver reported that funds originally set aside for annual sealcoating had <br />been incorporated into the PMP for additional segments during the sealcoating <br />moratorium and awaiting results of delamination research. Mr. Culver advised <br />there were probably some savings, but also additional work performed for <br />stormwater and water maintenance projects this year. Mr. Culver advised that <br />he would look into that and provide further information. <br />Page 17 of 18 <br />