My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_01704
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF1000 - PF1999
>
1700-1799
>
pf_01704
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2016 2:12:12 PM
Creation date
1/27/2016 2:23:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
1704
Planning Files - Type
Variance
Address
2545 Hamline Ave N
Project Name
Rosepointe
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
146
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Variance One <br />A• Variance is requested for the fotiowdng section of th <br />�•�70��� � structure or buildin � city code: <br />feet in hetght, wP�ichever ps Je�9.shail exceed 3 stories or 30 <br />B• State exactly what is intended to be dane on or with <br />. whtch does no� conform wtth the�Cifiy code• thQ P�OP�rty <br />Max im <br />um proposed heighfi is 6 sfiories, or approximately <br />58' (see site �tan and elevation): <br />Supporting argumer�ts for this modificatlon are: <br />i. <br />2. <br />Programmatic and economic conslde�ations have r <br />compact floor plan,, and as a result a �9uired a more <br />(refer fo stte plans). Advanfiages are greaterysetbacksbullding <br />oPen space and more land to �esolve slte draina e � more <br />additlon to the benefifis to the project program9andsfunctijn <br />The or�j oning. <br />�l•eP, thenn�ighborsUtodthe soufihg *he south <br />) is now setpbackrl25'tfrom <br />proper�y fine, in reference �o -hhe partial site section, fihe <br />four story height is virtuall <br />approved three stor y eq�ivalent to the p�eviously <br />greater setback allowsCfo ea greatertbuff��creased setback. <br />for p►anti� a space d <br />the <br />The <br />9 v(sual screen between the neiGhborsaandmthe roan <br />Ro�ePolnfie develapment. . <br />3. The over-all he(ght of the <br />grade) is equivalent to the proposed 4 tsto�ycs ��e40' above <br />change in rc�of conf iguration. , due to the <br />4• The sIx sfiory po��lon o <br />of the site, Its form <br />by the 6ower building W; <br />Apartmsnt views on the : <br />pond, and site interior, <br />5. <br />r. <br />the bu 1 i d i ng i s I oc;ated i-o the 1 nter ior <br />s shtelded from the neighbors •to the south <br />�9 i�'efer to partial site section?. <br />`h and 6th floor are orlented to the park, <br />not towa rd the neig hbors. <br />Th�a building pian and elevation are articufated by va ryring se�backs <br />wi ndow and parapefi treatments, ma-her i a! s used, and I an <br />Thls reduces the scals of the buiiding and adds architectura�jtinter' <br />est. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.