CC_Minutes_2015_1216 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Special City Council Meeting Wednesday, December 16, 2015 Page Z 2015. Mr. Paschke noted that this original final plat and Planned Unit Develop- ment (PUD) Amendment created one new lot and revised two existing lots allow- ing a new future anchor tenant, parking structure and out-parcel development, as detailed in the Request for Council Action (RCA) dated December 15, 2015. Since that approval, Mr. Paschke noted that JLL has learned that JC Penney (JCP) corporate headquarters is opposing the parking deck on its lot and consequently the proposed lot configuration. Given that opposition, Mr. Paschke advised that JLL has revised the final plat to address JCP's concerns, which subsequently af- fects lot lines, but not the location of planned improvements. Mr. Paschke noted that the changes in lot lines as detailed in the RCA and site plan (Exhibit A) may require slight modification to the PUD Agreement to address changes in lot con- figurations, but otherwise only represented s land trade-off between JLL and JSP expanding Lot 2, Block 1 as shown in Exhibit B as the final plat submitted for City Council approval tonight. Mr. Paschke noted that the new Lot 2 was created for the store addition, and Lot 1 expanded next to the parking deck, with JCP in- corporating the remainder of the remaining lot. At the request of Councilmember McGehee, Mr. Paschke confirmed that it was staff's understanding that both JJL and JCP were happy with this revised ar- rangement. No one from the public appeared to speak to this issue. City Attorney Gaughan referenced page 2 of the draft resolution (Attachment C), Condition 6, noting that since the PUD Agreement had already been approved, he recommended striking the proposed Condition 6 language and revising it as fol- lows: Condition 6: "Approval of any necessary amendment(s) to the previous Planned Unit Development Agreeinent, as determined by the City Attorney relat- ed to legal descriptions created by this revised plat." McGehee moved, Laliberte seconded, adoption of Resolution No. 11284 (Exhibit C) entitled, "A Resolution Amending the Previously Approved Final Plat of Rosedale Center Fifth Addition (PF15-019);" amendecl as follows: Condition 6: "Approval of any necessa�y amendment(s) to the pNevious Plannecl Unit Development Agreement, as determined by the City Attorney relatecl to le- gal descriptions c�eated by this revised plat. " Roll Call Ayes: Laliberte, McGehee, Willmus, Etten and Roe. Nays: None. b. Approve Outdoor Agricultural Research Plots as a Conditional Use Senior Planner Bryan Lloyd was present to review this request for approval of outdoor agricultural research plots as a CONDITIONAL USE, as detailed in the