My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2015_1216
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2015
>
CC_Minutes_2015_1216
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/12/2016 3:10:18 PM
Creation date
2/1/2016 2:33:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
12/16/2015
Meeting Type
Special
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Special City Council Meeting <br />Wednesday, December 16, 2015 <br />Page 7 <br />pesticide applications and posting of their sites, and application constraints on <br />windy days. Councihnember McGehee stated that residents considered that a <br />natural park area, and had done their due diligence to ensure that park land was <br />not affected. <br />Mr. Haun stated that he had worked in those U of MN fields as a student there, <br />and noted the type of application used that was rated for indoor use and its nomi- <br />nal affect. Mr. Haun advised that the current Cal�t, Inc. employee was certified <br />for indoor application, and would be pursuing the additional %2 day course to re- <br />ceive certification for outdoor application. Mr. Haun further advised that each <br />chemical they used listed specific conditions for its application; and they main- <br />tained a log of what and when that application was made, which was open to the <br />public for their inspection. Mr. Haun assured the City Council and public that <br />they would not in any way be applying chemicals to the extent of the U of MN. <br />At the request of Councilmember McGehee, Mr. LaSalle and Mr. Haun advised <br />that Cal�t, Inc. was still considering the type of screening for the plots from the <br />road and the pros and cons of fencing the plots to screen thein. With Coun- <br />cilmember McGehee noting the use of signs when the U of MN applied chemicals <br />for the public's awareness, Mr. Haun advised that Calyxt, Inc. would also provide <br />due diligence on signage, as required for the public and their firm's employees, of <br />what had been applied, when applied, and when it was safe to go back on the <br />plot(s). Mr. Haun advised that the concept was to screen the test plots from the <br />street, as they didn't want people walking through them, noting that the plots were <br />not flat like those at the U of MN. <br />Councilmember McGehee referenced the regulating agency information provided <br />to-date, but expressed her personal concern in cutting trees on site, as noted by the <br />U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, asking that tree removal be limited between Oc- <br />tober and March to accommodate nesting of certain wildlife species. <br />Greg Smith <br />Mr. Smith clarified that Cal�t, Inc. preferred not to cut any trees unless absolute- <br />ly necessary; and noted the stand of trees (Site Map B) that would need removed <br />for their parking lot, but those along the lot line would involve removal of very <br />few, since the test plots would mostly be operated on the bare area of the parcel <br />where there were no trees. <br />Public Comment <br />Dwayne Metz, 2926 Mildred Drive (east side of Langton Lake) <br />Mr. Metz advised that the City Council had addressed most of his concerns relat- <br />ed to chemical runoff and cheinical drift concerns. Mr. Metz offered his compli- <br />ments and positive feedback to the City Council in addressing his concerns up- <br />front. <br />Council Discussion <br />Condition C(Outdoor cultivation and research/Pertinent Re u�lating A eg ncies� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.