Laserfiche WebLink
l�I2fiZONING REQUEST <br />APPLICATION FOR Ai�NDt��NT OF ZONING ORDI�IANCE <br />ZONING MAP DISTRICT BOUNDARY CHANGE <br />VILLAGE �F ROSEVILLE, I�tINNES4TA <br />� 2 � 3..�i <br />�� <br />Fea: $100,�0 <br />Case Noo ��� <br />in or rintin in n. the spaces <br />irect ons: i out t is orm in up ca e y typ g p S <br />provided �re insufficient, use addition$1 sheets, keying information to the propex item <br />numberso <br />1. L Z�f;-.I��UF��=CTL�RIN <br />am8 o wner: <br />2. 1881 F:ICE ST�EET <br />ress o wner: <br />3 _ , m <br />� , ., g�� <br />4. <br />S. <br />60 <br />as t <br />am�P1P cant: �La <br />(First, <br />ST . Pa �!L <br />reet tY <br />i rs <br />St. Paul <br />�ti; oe an treet <br />18�1 Ri�e Street, <br />re"� et � rBSS O <br />�t. paul, t�Kinnesota <br />perty nvo ve : <br />t. 79 Plat b9ltQ Parcel �9� �0 Sha <br />escription o roperty nvo ve t <br />Beach <br />e <br />MIMJtr�soTh _ 55113 <br />ota <br />ae <br />� <br />� <br />Pr�sent 9 Residential Proposed s Co*r:mercial �,,,� <br />7, Zaninb District: �,., <br />Proposed: Commercial �'"� �'4. <br />S Use. Present; �rc�e ��.�4.'°" <br />. ' <br />9. 'What change or changing conditians make �i�e passage of this amendment necessary? <br />�ee attached letter <br />I0, What is the expected �ffect of the proposed amendment? <br />Nano other than present lase (st,orgge af trvak equi-pmer�t) <br />11, H�hat erro�� if anY, in Lhe existing zoning map and/or text of the zoning orda.na.nce <br />wauld b+e correc�ed by the proposed amendment? <br />Propert� <br />is soned commercial and fenced in ita entirety along with eonmercial lo�s <br />�� 'ji and 8 prior to mas'Ger pis.n. <br />22. �Vhat other ci.rcuanstances justify the- amendmen�c? <br />on er�roa.chia on sonth�re�t <br />� Ke �'eel• that ao i�di'�ridual �ro�Id purchase t�ia prap�r�ty �a� zoned <br />, re�iden�ia3. �o build a hc�te �1�e <br />� ::::' _ <br />