My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_00548
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF001 - PF999
>
500-599
>
pf_00548
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/16/2016 2:19:27 PM
Creation date
2/9/2016 12:34:50 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
0 <br />� <br />� <br />� <br />October 1, 1969 <br />CA S E NO : <br />APPLiCANT: <br />LOCATIOf�: <br />AC710N REQUES�'ED: <br />� <br />. <br />•. . <br />Eugene Bahnemc�nn <br />E4sfi c�f Lexington Av�nue, South of County Road C <br />See Sketch <br />Relocation of an existing dweliing unit <br />PLANNING CONSlDERATIONS: <br />1. The applicant proposes �o move an existi�rig dwelling, now on wheels,in Minnea olis <br />to 2656 North Lexingt�n Avenue. Pictures of the proposed structure have beenp <br />su6mitted and will be available for the Planning Commission and Council to <br />view at the hearings. <br />2. The Building Inspector has inspected the structure and notes that: <br />"An inspection was made of the above described d�vell'ir�g <br />now presently located in Minneapolis, Minnesota, This dweliing <br />is approximately 30 to 40 years old and structuraliy conforms to <br />our building code. This dweliing is compqtible with the existing <br />adjacent structures. " <br />3. It would appear from that report that there is no technical reason for not <br />approving the relocation of the structure. There is a questiQn in our mind, <br />however, regarding the appropriateness of moving a single family home into <br />an area that is designated for future multiple development. You will recall <br />that in the 701 planning study � it was suggested that the area in question <br />(across the street from the Village Hall site) should be developed for multiple <br />housing units consisting with the existing development now underway to theeast. <br />It would be appropriate to question the appl icant with respect to his intentions <br />and his awareness of the future pafential of the property. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.