My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_00484
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF001 - PF999
>
400-499
>
pf_00484
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/17/2016 2:40:18 PM
Creation date
2/9/2016 12:34:55 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
�� <br />� � , <br />� � <br />�: Village ?:ara�er <br />FROM: Public Works Director <br />�: Ban-Con's Heatherwood Plat <br />T'ne H�atherwood Plat which is being developed by the Ban-Con <br />shown on the attached ma Company, is ' <br />p• As can be seen, the northerly street in this <br />plat is Brooks Avenue. Upon the recommendation of the Villa e <br />street was located so that it would �, this " <br />Park at tbe nortbeast portion of theppl tae In�doage Soong the Village S` <br />witb the location of the Williams Brothers Pipelines� in�this�areact exists <br />pipeline company has a 30 foot easement across the southerl ��e <br />the park area, as shown on the attachecl map, Y portion of <br />We bave had discussions with Mr <br />as the Ba.n-C,on people and representaives�from�Ba1Peline cornpany, as well <br />who ar�preparing the plans for Ban-Con. th�r Engineering Company, - <br />about w ose responsibility it is for loweringsandlrelocatin Ce�tered around <br />�" pipelines so �hat Brooks Avenue may b� constructed. Bec�ause existing � <br />�ng ground in this area is so irregular the '�he exist- -��� <br />order to facilitate the new ' pipelines must be lowered in <br />grade of Brooks Avenue . N,,r. Ad.a.mson of the ;; �', <br />pipeline company bas stated to me tbat he taas sure that his company would <br />agree '�� lowering the pipelines as needed so that the road can be con- <br />structcd,, with a, total cost to be borne b tne s' <br />Village would a gr e e t o t h e f o l l o w i n g con di tionsplpeline com pa n y i f t h e <br />S:� ' <br />, : j: <br />:N�I <br />� ( r,' :i <br />1• Off -set tbe centerline of the sstr�et <br />5` to the south so V <br />that the pipelines would not lie tirithin the traveled roadway. ��' <br />2• Grant tbe pipeline com an an � <br />they may have room to pep ir theirtl�nes i� �asement so that <br />arise or xoom for a f uture pipeline, i:f needede occasion may <br />It would be my recommenda�ion that the ease.;�ent be �ranted to <br />company providing that (:L.) they lower the pipelines at no costhtoptbeline <br />Village (2.) that it is stipulated that the Village wi11 have per.�ission <br />to construct driveways a� approximately right an�les to the pipelines for <br />access to t�e paxk fro� Brooks Avenue. <br />It is my opinion that because the Vill��;e required Ban-Con to locate the <br />roa,d in its present location, �he roblem of L <br />exists. Therefore, I ieel tnc Vilpage has an�oblp�;a�ioneLobsolgelthise j'�ay, <br />blem. pro- <br />T would like to discuss this r�at�e� �urtaer ���t� yca �;, �ha� we may �r�cee <br />and try and have it resolved at the �une 23, 1a6� Council :�eeting, as Ba,n-Con <br />Saants to prog;ess yritb their grad,in� of Broo�ss Avenue in tnis p1a�, <br />� <br />June 12, 1g69 <br />i' ; ':� � ��, <br />� </ .;'-'., > <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.