Laserfiche WebLink
� <br />� <br />�:�E �: ���� <br />����.(��i� : %?11"t�i� �A �+Clr�tir� <br />l��C;ATl��: West of Hamlisre l�wenve, OCf�S frOrt� C�o�CCrC3! <br />ACTI�N REQUES�ED: Spe�Aol us� far ornended t�evalopm+ent plon <br />PlANiVt�lG C�'JrdSlDE�A�fiIC?NS: <br />1, Th� prc�erty in questior� hvs previously been reroned to the "R-3" distr►ei end <br />o planr►�sr� unit dev��e�apment wc� eppravad in luiyi of iast yeor. �ince thot <br />time som� adjustments in gfod�a hcve b+een made in .cooprte�tio� with t�e Viliage <br />in reiatian�hip �o its pork site to the w�5r and o stor�►� sevver projer.t ha� alie- <br />viated a drainage cc9ndition aiFecai�►g the p�t�erty in q.�es�ion. <br />2. Mr. Carbon� now proposes to pro�eed with the co�xtructio�n �^'� the first bui Id- <br />ing �n a thrts bui lding camplex wF�ich has b�en rp-designed to conform to <br />the moc�ified "R-3" muitipl� r�gulotion3. The proposed developmer►t confr�rvns <br />to the der�sity requ�rements a�r►d ail ather requiremer��s of tMe "R-3" district <br />includi�g the 1.75 porkir�g spoces pe� unit with half o� these in gorages. <br />3. `The dev�lo�prnenl� con3ists af two �2-un�t buildings nnd on� 60���►it bvidding. <br />At thas time it is canticipot�d to construct only the single 42-!�nit buifding <br />fronting on Hamlin� Avenus. A sirnilca� building wcas proposed in the origir►al <br />plan opproved by th� Pla�nning Commission and Counci l. <br />4. �ne �of the prvblems with this site is thafi the soUth�rly 80' of ths property in <br />question contiguous to the existi�g Northern State3 Power highli�e 6s under <br />cc�nsiderofi+�n (or was) as part c�f a proposed pork gtrip conne�ting four oF th� <br />perks c�ong the propos�d N. 5 � P. high I i ne deve I opme nt � At the s�ggest i on <br />of the Vil�ege sta�ff, thi� �0' has been remavsd from the devefapm�nt p�a� i� <br />ar�tictpation of the possibility of this park strip mcaterilizing> Ever��s of the <br />Ic�st few d�tys� �+owever, may pre�clude such a park strip development, thus <br />putting into dc�ubt the val�dity of the plc�n it5elfe The applicant has pre��ared, <br />how�var, an alternate plon which leave3 the propos�d buildXng in the sanne <br />plece but moditi�ies the parking arrangement �tilizing the 80' strip i� que�tt��on. <br />Thus, �t moy be feosible to app��ve the development des�gn wirh alterc�ati�es <br />o� to the final park'rng arfangement to be construGted. <br />5. There ars additiona0 engineering detail; +th�,i appear to hcrve not been compfeted <br />at the time �� this writing. The applicant has be�n adrr►onished to fur�,i�h this <br />informdtion ?o the'Villag� Engineer for his report i�� time ft�r the Planning �om- <br />mission hearing. <br />