pf_00466 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

� � August �+, I �65 Dear Sir, A m reaction to I am :vri ti n� thi s 1 etter to conv..y Y the proposed variance to the zonin� ordina~�ce. It i� rea! I y no surori se that I�.1r. Chandl er 4�ou I d seek to a,� �,,�r the zoni na I aws agai n. I was o,ui te di sappo� nted v�hen trie �osevi I I e offi ci al s changed the statusresente residentiat property adjoining my home to ��s P status. When I par.chased my home Iwould not have considered it if the residential properiy had not been there as a buffer. I would rather see mr. Chandter remain v�ithin the Regardless zoning ordinance which he asked f or andegetare some of t�hE vari ance however I thi nk th�OU i� b�e ob � i gated considerations that Mr. Chand i er s to take care of if he is given permission to build a parking �o�� I, Adequate p I ans for c�+�ai nage of the water c� i tlnbE� to and from the property to highway 3S sho approved by the planning commission. 2, A redwood fence simi I ar to the one on��ec�ted South side fo his property should be around the parking lot with a buffer area between our property line and the fence immediately surrounding the parking lot. Replantinc7 done of the trees already on the property �n question in the buffer zone to form a screen of f olia�e. As to the variance requested: �nr. Chandler� ciaim for special consideration is based on theuf}nt hwa is cutting off his property ca 9 that the hiq Y feel that ►`�� him to move his access and parkinqet back if the oarking �S not intitled to a varianCs theSparkina area that area he is askinr� for exceed project. To be i � �Ai nn tal�cen away by fihe ',�i ahway mo re exp I i ci �� I d�nt fee I that P�ir Chand I ers i nab i�� ty �o p I an � or the norrnal ex�a��si on of such a pred�t cab °e business should �:vork a hardshio on the adjo�n�no wners. If� a� ��r. Chandl er wanted was a parki n� nome o '.�