pf_00381 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

� � � �.� May 3, 1967 CASE: APPLICANT: LOCATION: � � 381-b7 I . L. Dahlin � � Southwest Com�� of Droper Avenue and Chatsworth ACTION REQUESTED: App�oval of Division of a lot and Variance to Side Yard Setb�ck PLANNING CONSIDERATIOI�aS: The pr�rerty in question is a long narrow porcel along the east side of Chatsworth same 328 fezt in lenqth with a width of 63 feet. An existing structure is lo�ated on the south portion of the property in question and applicant proposes fo divide the lot into two lots. 2. The proposed lot to be created on thz north side ur �ne property in question wo�+ld be 63 feet by 1 18. 1; feer, This lot is abviously under the 100 foot minimum frar��age requirement for r corner lot, however, due to the existing development and old p�atting in the area, there is n� way to increase the width of this lot. Thus, it would appea, reaso�able to div;de the property in question into tv�o F�rcels inasmucl� as there i� adequate !ength alony Chatsworth ,�,venue to accomplish this. 3. The principal question involved is the applicants d�s" ro have a variance established for the side yard setback off of Chatsworth, wh�ch according to the ardinance would be required to be 30 feet. !n this case, the applicants would iike a commitme�t prior to selling t't,e. lotto allow a 23 foot setback ratF��r thon the 30 required. The property to the south has �n existing gorage which is now 14 feet from Chotsworth A�ienue. �. (n this case, where the existing lot width fs much smaller than the 100 feet, it would appear reasonable to allow the 23 foot setback rather than the 34 wh�ch would apply both to a house or garage constructed on the property. You will recall that in the past we have allo�ved sucf� variances where we have diffi:.ult lot conditions as long as there is adequate space r�� park a car in iront nf the garage (. minimum of 20 feet) It would appear reasonable to grant the division of the lot and the variance in questioc�. 5. in thi� transoction, ho�veve�, it is importQnt to secure the 30 foot of righl�-of-way which has not been dedicated aiong rhe north ,�de of this property. The applicanFs have in- dicated thei r i nT �nt ond desi re to do thi �.