My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_00079
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF001 - PF999
>
01-99
>
pf_00079
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/16/2016 4:18:29 PM
Creation date
2/9/2016 12:38:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
79
Planning Files - Type
Variance
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
, <br />i <br />r�,y 4, 1962 ` ; ; <br />� , <br />x <br />L" <br />F <br />, ' <br />R�PO RT TO THE VI LLAGE CO UN C I L <br />r� <br />SUB�TECT; Curbing at Clark Gas�line Station <br />Iexington & B <br />Gentlemen: <br />On tiro rk in connection with the staking of thc curb and sidewalk, it <br />was necessary to contact both Ramsey County (County Road B) and the <br />State Hi�hwa� Department ( I�xin�ton ) . <br />The approved pla�n calls For the face of th� curb �Lo be 2�} feet from the <br />center line of each street. There is a t�affic s�maphore located on this <br />corner which would have to be relocated if the curbin� were to be installed <br />as per plan. This matter was discussed with Messrs. Floyd Snyker and Wm. <br />Chenoweth of the County Lnginc�rs Office. They we�°^ �f the opiaion that <br />County I�ad B�ro��ld be improved in t��e foreseeable future and that the <br />surfac� width would be 44 £c:et, or 22 feet from the center line of �he <br />street to the fa.ce oz^ the curb. I� appears �hat t��e basic grade wi� 1 not <br />Ue chan�ed materially, but the driveways should be constructed to tl�� <br />s-treet rather than the street �;o the driveways. <br />In this line of' thought, they expressed that asphalt curbing and driveways <br />should be constructed. T'i�e sidewalk, as proposed, cou11 be construc�tea az"' <br />concre�Le as it wi.11 be f ive f eet f rom the f ace oi the curb . <br />A propa.�ed grade oi' the curbin� will be submitted to the County Engir_eer <br />for app��oval prior to permittin�, �;he owner to procede with this construction. <br />In re�ard to Iexington Avenue, the State has not yct made comment on thE <br />wa.d�:h of I.�xin�ton. It has been proposed to the State that the existing <br />elevation at a point 22 feet �ast of the center line and opposite the south <br />prop�rty line be used as the controlling point of the center line. From <br />this point north to the inlet within the street, and just nortb of the curbing <br />on Count,y I�ad B, a straight 6rade should be used. <br />As Iexin�ton may revert to the County in the f uture, Messrs. Snyker and <br />Chenoweth were asked about the County interests. They pointed. out that this <br />was not under their juris�iiction. 'I�hey did state, however, that if Iexington <br />wcre to revert to the C�unty's jurisdiction, the grade would probably have <br />to be improv�d as it is now at what is considered a less than minimum grade. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.