Laserfiche WebLink
� <br />� <br />aun� 2, 1965 <br />� <br />Co3t� i�umb�r; �,5 273 <br />ApplicanlF Ar�hie Johnson <br />21Qp �Io. Lex�ngton A�ren�e <br />� <br />����}�o,�; Nar�hwesfi carner �af l,exington t"�yenu� an� Pa►ker Avenu� <br />Action R�quested: Divi�ion �f an existinc� lot <br />Pldnn�ng Cc�n�id�r�tions: <br />t. <br />2. <br />� <br />ihis zt�m �+rc7s �� t��� ag��o for th� M�y m�:eting, <br />but was he1J over ta the June meeting <br />ce�use th� o p1i��nt did not o+p�aec�r. The �r��ert�{ in qunsfiicn has 229 ft of frontogE: <br />be P <br />on Pdrker Aven�e and ca dF:pth of i�5 �t. <br />' ro ased to divid� the propc�-t� in#o trwo Iahs, ��ith the �aste�rly �ot occupi�d by on <br />It �s p P <br />existin� havse to hcr��� E� ft �f fe�onta�e or� ParkEr ��venue. This �lot ��an���for thi <br />� <br />,� �q�+are footac�� af 11,4J� squar� ft. Ti�p m�n�mum requireci by t�� <br />k�nd af (ot is II,OUO sqvare f�. <br />3. <br />4. <br />5. <br />Th <br />e secor�d lat would be a�orner lot with 145 ft of frontage on �'arkEr ae f i�3fi ft� o�f <br />frontoge on L�xongPan Av�:nue. 7his iot Qx pr�po�� �ouid have a sqvar g <br />J5 s t�are ft. �he requir�d ared fpr a corner Oat is l2, 50fl0 squnre ft and 100 ft <br />19,5 q <br />of fr�antage . � <br />' ton Avenue is one of the major r�or�h-south thorouc�hfares �for which there should <br />Lex�ng <br />of v+�ay is gradu�ally being vvidened from 6b ft to 99 ft. �hu of���►� 5� with�a dedicated <br />be ��n additoonal dedicatior� of 1b.5 ft so as to have ca tntal <br />rig��t of way frcam the c�nfier 1 ine af Le�i n�ton Avenue . <br />This wa�uld be consistent with <br />P <br />a�� po{i�y with respec� to deve��lopment of property c�ionc� Lexingtan Av�nue. <br />Ur�der � <br />hese conditions Phe 145 ft s�F frantage an Pa�ker �v�nue as proposed would be <br />re�luced to (26.5 ft. <br />4. 1n <br />osmuch a3 both f'�o�Cer Avenue and Lexingtan Ave�ue are establishe onshietto this�9 <br />t�ae p�op�rty in question, t�e�e wa��d appear,to be no P hat mi IhtrbeQencou:� ered, there <br />rrqc�est. ihus, subject to ony engineer�ng asai ��is� not be easonoble for �he property <br />vwould appear to be no �eason why the prop <br />i� question. <br />� <br />