My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_00525
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF001 - PF999
>
500-599
>
pf_00525
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/14/2024 2:14:04 PM
Creation date
2/9/2016 12:40:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
525
Planning Files - Type
Division of Land
Address
3075 Woodbridge St
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� <br />CJ <br />� <br />Jul�� 2, i969 <br />CAS E NO: <br />pPPLICANT: <br />�OCATION: <br />� <br />ACTION REQUESTED: <br />� � <br />525-69 <br />Edwin J. Kuhne <br />East of Woodbridge, South of Woodlynn <br />(See Sketch) <br />Division of Lot <br />PLANNItrJG CONSIDERATIONS: <br />1. The Appl icant owns the area of lanci west of th� lots that frant on Woodbric�ge <br />Avenue. This land is shown on the s{cetch at the left and is surrounded by <br />Viilage park virtually on the south �,ide and on the v.�est side. This apF►lication <br />is made with the intent of acq�airing a means of access to this p�operty with <br />the intent of ultimately developing the property behind the houses on the west <br />side of Woodbridge. <br />2. We have discussed this proposal, on several occasions, with th� Applicant <br />attempting to assist him to arrive at a reasonable solution. ThPre are considerable <br />difficulties in attempting to develop the land because of the nature of the soil <br />and the lack of direct access to public streets. The current proposal is, as we <br />und�rstand it, to use the portion of the lot that is requested to be divided from <br />the lot on tfi�e southwest corner of Woodlynn and Woodbridge as a means of <br />private access to two lots which would be developed on the northerly part of <br />the property owned by the applicant. We suggest that such a temporary solution <br />may �vell make the problem worse rather than bettere It would appear that the <br />reasonable way to handle this proposal is one of reviewing the plan for the <br />entire area, although only a portion of it might be developed in the initial <br />stages. <br />3. Obviously a part of the solution should be the dedication of the very poor land <br />on the westerly portion of the property owned by the Ap�licant to the Village <br />Park System� Another solution would be the acquisition of all of the property <br />in question for park purposes, which wos the origina) plan in the Park Plan <br />prepared back in 1960� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.