Laserfiche WebLink
�� <br />�J <br />� � <br />AAa y 7 , 1969 <br />��SE NO: <br />APPLICAt�1T: <br />LOCAT 10 N: <br />ACTION REf�UESTED: <br />� � <br />504- 69 <br />Lad Propert�es. I�c. <br />No�rheosr Car�ne� or Coa,nty Road B and dale $treet <br />Spec�al Use �Pe►m�� for Planned Unit Development <br />PLANNING CONSIDERATIQNS. <br />1. This capplicat�on wt�s d+scussed �n co�s�de+c�ble detail at the iast maeting <br />o� the Planning Commissionw at which time '�� wras tabled so as to allow the <br />appl icant time to prepare a g�d�ng plan and ihe exterior elevations oF the <br />building, <br />2e You will recrll f►•om th� presen�ation that the proposed development plan <br />is similar to the or ey�nal plan ap�ro�ed by the Planning Commission and <br />Counc�) except that the number af ���ts p��oposed is, brought up to the <br />allowable limirs of tl�e d�ns'�ty ��eq:,�-emen�s of the "R=3A" District. Inas- <br />much as ar�as of cr►tical �ohce��n cu���g�o�s to exisfirng single family <br />� s homes in the �mmediare �nrere handled �n a manner� similar to the origina� <br />proposal, it would appear that the plan w'�If Represe�# a workable s�alution <br />similar to the orig�nal plan approved, <br />3. The current pr�cblem is ti�at to date we have received no addifiiona) plans <br />from the applicanta In the inte►�est of saving t�me� it is hoped that the <br />plans requested by the Planning Comm'�ssion and agreed to by the applicant <br />at the last meet�ng� ca� be pr•e�a��ed :n t'me fo► a r�ev�ew prior to th�e <br />next Pla��ning Comm'�ss�on meef',�g ��Ne wo:,ld nore that the careful <br />preparation of the gr�ad�ng plan fo� 1Me p��operty �� quQstion is extremely <br />importanp � This is becfluse the s�te has a co�s�de��able grade difference <br />within the area and the spac�ng of the la•ge�� b��ld�ngs than originally <br />proposed in the fir�st plan �eq�i�es co�ef�l ad��stments of elevations to make <br />them fit the s�re p►ope�ry : <br />�J <br />