Laserfiche WebLink
� <br />We are granting to the Village of Roseville a strip <br />of land 30 feet wide immediately north of the platted land and adjacent <br />to Orchard Lane, to be used as an additionaJ, width of and for Orchard <br />Lane with the understanding that the said Village will improve the <br />said Orchard Lane and the additional 30 feet so as to benefit the <br />persons who own or will own t:he lots adjacent to the said Qrchard Lane. <br />We therefore ��sk variances in the lots specification <br />for Lots I., 2, and 3 as follc�ws : <br />1. Lot 1 ��o have a frontage: on La.keview <br />Aver�ue oi` 8:1.1 feet instead oF 85 feet as <br />��rov: ded by the code. The s�►id Lot 1 <br />wi11 he prowided with an easement to Che <br />drive:�ay immediately south o£ the lot �or <br />the �,urpase of ingress and egress. Said <br />easement to be in common with the owners of <br />Lots 6 and the pro�erty immediately south <br />of Lot 6. <br />2. Lot 2•to lbe GO feet widl:h an Lakeviaw <br />Avenue iLtistead of 100 widtb as pra�vided �y <br />the code but to be 158 feet in lerigth al�ng <br />Orchard Lane. <br />3. Lot 3 to have a width of 90 f`eet and a <br />length of 17U feet instead of dept:h of <br />110 feet a5 provided by the code. <br />The reason we are asking the variances is that the <br />granting of the 30 �eet to widen Orchard Lane makes it impossible <br />to have a 100 foot depth. <br />r:, <br />� <br />-.':"';:i; <br />�s` <br />>.J <br />" :�: <br />_� <br />