My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_00532
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF001 - PF999
>
500-599
>
pf_00532
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2017 4:32:31 PM
Creation date
2/9/2016 12:43:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
532
Planning Files - Type
Rezoning
Applicant
Partridge Construction Co.
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
u <br />August 6, 1969 <br />CAS E NO: <br />APPLICANT: <br />LOCAT 10 N : <br />ACTiON REQUESTED: <br />532-69 <br />Partridge Constru��tion Company <br />West �f 35W north of County Road BP2 <br />Approval of Rezoning from I-1 to (-2 <br />PLANNI�IG CUNSIDERATIONS: <br />1. Th� property in question as shown on the sketch at the left would consist <br />af 11 .?2 acres with a proposed public street ta be piatt�d in the westerly <br />side as shown. The applic�nt requested th�t the lar�d be rezon�d from <br />I-1 to 1-2 to allow the construetion of a saies and service building for <br />Mack Trucks� Incorporated. The property was originally zoned I-1 <br />wiih the intent of encouraging later more intensiwe industry on property <br />contiguous to the free�way, We are not aware of th� exact detai Is of <br />th� proposed dev�lopment, but the site plcan woulc� indicate the relat�vsly <br />small buiiding compared to rhe tofial site area. !t wou(d appear that <br />either ex�eansion is being allowed for ar that the property might be <br />divided fa�r further use. <br />2. The big question here is whether it is in the Vil lage's interest to al iow <br />the continued development of motor freiyht ind�striE�s on some af the <br />f�w remai�ing parce�s of industrial iand, particularl;y those contiguous <br />ta the interstate highway system. Obviously, it woulc� be b�fter for <br />the Viliage if the land could be developed for more� intensive us�s not <br />requiring the vast acreage of parking for the truck service relatec! fi�ld. <br />Having no detc�ils as to the nature of fhe proposed buiiding itself, we <br />cannot commer�t as to the extent to which this buelding might car•ry oufi <br />fihese objectives. Normaily, the burden of proofs is on the applicant <br />toshowthat it is in theVillage interest to rezone the land in question. <br />Additional information as fio th� type of structure propc�sed, and th� use <br />of the remaining land woulcl be pertinent. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.