My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_00378
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF001 - PF999
>
300-399
>
pf_00378
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/1/2017 4:29:35 PM
Creation date
2/9/2016 12:44:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
378
Planning Files - Type
Variance
Address
1926 N. Chatsworth
Applicant
Thomas Rice
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� <br />� <br />� <br />May 3, 1967 <br />CASE: <br />APPLICANT: <br />LOCATION: <br />� <br />ACTION REQUESTED <br />378 -67 <br />Thomas Rice <br />975 Ros�l ewn Avenue <br />� <br />� <br />North of County Road A2 west of Chatsworth (See sketch} <br />Approval of side yard variances <br />QLANNING CONSI[?ERATIONS: <br />Mr. Rice proposes a variance to the property so that a Mr. G. T. Gi Igosch may <br />purchase the property and construct a home if the variance is granted as requested. <br />Mr. Gilgosc� points out that he ''possesses plons for a home which will fit on the <br />described prop�erty only if the zoning variance is granted". <br />2. The request is for a five foot setback on the left ;ide of the house and a four foot <br />setback on the right side of the hou�e. The (ot is 75 feet in width. <br />3. Many of t'�e homes in this varied area �f the Vi Ilage were developed on 75 foot <br />lots prior t� th� adoption of the new lot size require�nents and a 10 foot side yard <br />�etback. The old s�de yard setback w. `ive feet. Thus, ir� many cases where we <br />have new homes going on existing lots in these areas, it is reasonable to apply the <br />five foot setback if it has been done in the other portions of the neighborhood, <br />In this case, we would suggest the members of the Planning Commission and Council <br />view the site in question and ascertain, for themselves, whether the five foot setback <br />is reasonable for the pr•operty in question. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.