Laserfiche WebLink
June 4, 1969 <br />CAS E NO : <br />APPLICANT: <br />LOCAT 10 N: <br />518-69 <br />Ray Richardson <br />2]71 North Victoria Avenue (See Sketch) <br />ACT 10 N REQU EST ED: Voriance to S ide Yarcl Setback <br />PLFNNING CONSIDERATIONS: <br />�, The applicant has an existing homeHe trQpo esto conlstruct a512 footent <br />side yard setback of 13 1/2 feet. p, <br />garage on the north sid�, leaving a s�tl�ack of 1 1/2 feet to the adjoining <br />single family lofi. <br />2p The own�r of the single family lot to the north has stated in writin9foott <br />he approves the development of the gar�ge and the resultan�t 1 1/2 <br />h' 'de of i�he lo� and is 8 1/2 <br />K� <br />setback line. The neighbors garage is on t is s� <br />feet� from t�he property line� Thus, the tofial setback between tae onsaderable <br />would be 10 feet. The neighborse fronfi of the Varage istapp oxirrzately <br />d istance from the street so that th 5 <br />i n I i ne wi th the rear of the garage that i s proposed . <br />The applicant has an existing garage under the house which has ab�e�ccommodafied <br />the west (rear yard). Additional garage space could, of course, <br />on the site in this rear yard. The applicant, however, desires for this space <br />to remain open for purposes of recreation, et�. <br />4. Obviously the person most affected by the applic�ation is �h f�het�go osal <br />property owner, inasmuch as that in this case he approves o p p <br />as a question of balancing that consideration verses the presidence set by <br />the minimal setback proposed. <br />