pf_00544 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

n � , October 1, 1 S69 CAS E NO: APPLICANT: ACT10N REQUEST�D: LOCATIO N: 544-69 Roya101dsmob:ile(Sv�rahn Liquidating'�rust) Special Use Permit for Automabile Dealership Southwest of County� Road C-2 and Federal Aid interstate 35W PLANI�lING CONSiDERATIONS: 1. The propert� in qu�stion consists of the sau�h 60� feet of that pQrtio� of the land prap�sed for rezoning from I-1 to B-3 ea$t of Long Lake Road. $caling the survey submitted wouJd inu'icate it would consist nf approxorr�afiely 5 .8 acres . 2. To our knowledge, no p�ans for the proposed development have been submitted as a pQrt of this application. We suggest that i•his is an important part of fihe application consideration, inasmuch as the special us� appraval is frequ�ntly based upon the development plan proposed to which conditions may or mcay nof be add �ed , 3. Di;;cussi�g the proposal with the applicant, in the past, we have againr�itere�fed the important requirement of a concen'trated developmenf. One of the ideas reviewed as a means of ach�evir.g this was the c�evelopment� of cAmbined auto agencies util izing perhaps a common used car !of an property across Long Lake Roc�d where the area is (es5 directly related to the F q,A .l . 351N. Apparently the applicant has been un5uccessfui in achieving concentr4fion by this means. 4. Some ox the importan� considerations wifih respect to an automobile agency is the relationship ��' the size of the proposed structure fio the area c�f land to be accupi�d by� new and used cars. Used car sales are, of course, ess�entiaf to an automobile dealership. However, we rind that there is a considerabl� difference between auto agencies in terms of the size and value of the structures re�ating to the area of land fo be utilized for outside storage. These are consid�rations that will be important in eval�ating the proposed developrr�ent.