Laserfiche WebLink
� <br />• <br />� � <br />June 4, 1969 <br />C,�SENO: <br />APPLICANT: <br />LOCAT 10 N: <br />� � <br />521-69 <br />Richard Schre�er and Freston Brenon <br />Centennial Drive North of Terrace Drive <br />(See Sketch) <br />ACTION REQUESTED: Approval of Front Yard Varia�ce <br />PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: <br />1. "fhe applicant no�es in his application as follows: <br />"Single family has been constructed �n Lot 12 with a setback <br />of 23.5 feet at the closest point. This error resulted in part <br />because the curv� of the street causes the �etback to vary <br />considerably from the center of the home to either end. The <br />grade of all obove lots drop off r�ther abruptly at the rear and <br />without a variance in set�cick there is a strong possibil ity that <br />development of the remaining lots may be impractica�le." <br />The applicant is asking that the setback be reduced to 23.5 feet on Lots <br />10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16 of Block 1, Owassodale Addition. <br />2. There se�ms to be some question as to whPther or not the action requested <br />is reasonable without further dPmonstration that it represents a solution <br />to a severe hardship. We suggest that the applicant be questioned with <br />respect to this point. It may be only a question of saving a few dollars <br />by decreasing the amount of fill that may be required in the front yard to <br />retain the 30 foot seiback required. <br />