My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_00376
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF001 - PF999
>
300-399
>
pf_00376
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/1/2024 11:01:43 AM
Creation date
2/9/2016 12:46:43 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� <br />� <br />� <br />Iv�ay 3, 1967 <br />CASE: <br />APPLICANT <br />LOCATION: <br />� <br />376-67 <br />L"�J <br />The State of Minnesol�� H�ghwQy Department <br />County Road C and Snelling Avenue <br />ACTION REQU�STED; Approval of Preiiminary interchange D�sign <br />PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS� <br />1. The previously submitted design by the State Highway Departcnent for fihis intercf�ange <br />was disapproved by the Villsage due principally fio the existence of grade crossings �of <br />the rai (road on the part of one of the turning movements. The revisec! plan eliminates <br />this objection by moving the highway slightly to the west and having the turning <br />movements occur in the northwesterly quadrant anci the northeasterly quadrant. In �r <br />general we fee! this is the correct solution. <br />2. Tliere ar�e two problems here that bear furth�r investigation, hc►wever: (1) A portion <br />of the Village Park in the southwesterly quad,ant will obviously be required for this <br />interchange. We would like to check this further with the I�ecreation Department <br />to ascertain any dif�iculties involve�d here. �2) A prev�ously proposed service road <br />al�ng the west side or the interchange, running to the north from County Roac! C is <br />eliminated in the curr�nt desi�n. This we feel beryrs further investig�rion as to the <br />need �or such a s�rvice roc�r�. We would suggest t�,�, thz Planning �ommission <br />table c7nsideration af this interchc�nge pending further investigation or the two <br />prin�ipal problems outlined. <br />, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.