Laserfiche WebLink
� <br />".J <br />� <br />June 4, 1969 <br />CAS E NO: <br />APPLICANT: <br />LOCAT 10 N <br />� <br />M <br />512-69 <br />W i I( i arn Stenger <br />South oF Oakcrest Aven�e West of Lexington Avenue <br />(See Sketch) <br />ACTIOf�I REQUESTED: Division of Lats <br />PLANNING CO�ISIDE�;ATIONS: <br />1. As you will note from the sketch at the (eft, the properties in question <br />were part of a low wet area and as such were platted as very large lots, <br />known generally as Lots 11 and 12 af Block 5, To No Connor Plat. The <br />property was platted before the 85 foot restrictions weni• into effect and <br />thus, most of the (ots ir, the originai plat were done with 75 feet of <br />frontage. <br />2. !t is proposed now to subdivide the lots from two lots to three lots with <br />fro��tage of approximately 88,72 f�et eacho The width at the rear of the <br />lots would be 50.33 feet eacho The depth varies from lQl feet to 278 feet. <br />The smallest lot is approximately 14,000 square feet, and thus greatly <br />exceeds the minimum i i,000 square feet required for interior lots. <br />3. Inasmuch as the lots meet the minimum code requirements, and were <br />obviously platted at a larger scale for purposes of drainage, it would <br />appear apprnpriate to consider divwsion of the property so as to be more <br />in reasonable scale with the exisf�ing proper°ties in the areao Perhaps the <br />biggest problem here is that the division of the lots as proposed create <br />very long metes and bounds description even though they were parts of <br />the plan that was original ly platted o This suggests the possibil ity of <br />platting the properties in question rather� than util izing the excessively <br />long and cumber°some descriptions involved, <br />� <br />