Laserfiche WebLink
� • • <br />� Pebruary 9, 1984 <br />-4- <br />11) Murp}iy - 920-9280. Kevin Murphy, Herman Selz, and Jerry Hess, all of the <br />A9urrhy Company, were in with Don Fulton, realtor from Eberhardt. Murphy <br />proposes to list the property with �berhardt for sale, and wanted to <br />discuss alternatives with respect to the handling of tlie drainage on their <br />site. Tlie City has a drainage easement, wl�ich David Drown explained could <br />be adjusted and revised as long as t}ie same acrea�e were to Ue provided for <br />dxainage purposes. T}ie easement now goes all t}ie way to Terminal Road, tvhich <br />divides tlie property into two parcels. tiUe suggested, and they agreed, t hat <br />it may be better to c}�ange t}ie easement alignment so as ta make it possible <br />to develop tl�e parcel as a single piece. This also appears to improve <br />its visua.l accessibility from llig}iway 3G, tivith tlie possibility of a Uuilding <br />being on the north side of tlie pond, ratlier than east or west. A9r. Drown <br />suggested that they petition the City for the construction of �he ponding <br />impxovement, so t}�at appropriate studi�s and decisions can be made witli <br />r�spect to t�hat land could best be excavated and what land �vould t�est bs filled. <br />'T'he first impor�ant step liere would be soil conditions, which D�.vid lias already <br />gotten preliminary information. 7'hey were told that if the easement is <br />adjusted, that we would still �ieed at leasti a 20' easement from Terminal <br />Road to caxry the storm sewer which passes under 'I'erminal Road into the existing <br />ponding area. Tlley were advised tlle land is zo�ted industrial, is a part <br />of tiie tax in�cr.ement clistrict, and that tlie City is interested in more <br />intensive development of the land. They propose to file the petition for <br />� the cirainage project, and continue to m�rket the lanci to ultimate us�rs. <br />12) Elness - 339-5508. Arvid Llness, architect ior the I�fousing /�lliancc proj�ct <br />on Count�� Raad B, wa� in to discuss thEir current prol�osal anci file their <br />drawin�s anci ap}�lication forms �or the rezoning. '1'hexr propo��l is ior 130 <br />units, which is thc density allowed on the site in accordance with the <br />orclinance. 'I'l�ey would request rezoning fron� R-1 to R-3, a variance to the <br />setback on tlie soutli side of ti�e prnperty oi 7', a v�riance to t1�e 700 sq. <br />ft, of floc�r area r�quired for a one-Ued�oom u�nit, and a variancc to the <br />height o£ the build�ng, 1'hey pxropose to construct �he builcling with three- <br />staries, plus the ctarmal 11I11t5 on the eust sicle wing o� �he L-shaped str�ueture, <br />anci fivc stories plus the dormal units or� the south side. The origin€�1 <br />proposal was for six Eloors, plus clormal units on both win�s oi tlle structure. <br />��►e again i•evictiaed the possii�ility of lo«erin� thc east side building by ono <br />floor and moving the rest of the devclopment up near County Road (3, west of <br />tl�e lo�ver tliree-story builclin�. �d� believe tliis tivoulcl remove the clevelo�mont <br />as iar �is pQssible from tlte single-Eamily neighborliood, 1nd provide z law <br />screen wi.thin the orclinance requirements alon� the east side of tha property. <br />7'licy are gainb to reaiew this possibil:ity furtliei•; and in tlle ►nelntime, �ile <br />a pro��osed rezoning for llearing before tlie ['lanning Commission on Marcl� 8. <br />❑ <br />