Laserfiche WebLink
l_ J <br />� <br />LJ <br />S/23/f34-6/ 14/84 <br />-6- <br />20) 'I'rapp - 784-_2293. Jim Trapp was in with Glenn A�ichke who operates <br />a travel agency. b4r h4icllke is an investc�r, wlio wi�ll Jim Trapp, <br />wllo says he o�,ms the gas station a.nd two homes to t}ie west a.t tlie <br />site at tlle south►aest corner of Clevelancl and County Road C, requested <br />our opinion regarding a prop�sed expansion of tlie existing service <br />station. ��Je noted tjiat ilie vari an c� s granted to the service <br />station site several years ago were done on the condition tiiat <br />it was temporary use, and tllat tlie plan £or. the future was to <br />clear tlle si�te and develop a more appropriate and. int�nsive use <br />for tliis parcel. �Ve stressed t}ie fact that this site is at tlie <br />gateway to the developmen�s to t}le soutli an CJeveland, and that <br />it is important for tliem and tlle city t}tat t3ie site be more <br />appropriately developed. IVe discouxagedthem from proposing an <br />addition to tlle gas station, �ahicli woul.d a��p�ar to only con.�tinue <br />tlte relatively undesireaUle appearing faci.lity currently at this <br />site. Tltey askerl �aiiether the city miglit acquire the land as a <br />tax increment district ancl subsidize tlie development of tli� land. <br />1Ve noted tllat this is not tlle city's pol.icy at the momer►t and <br />tllat tl�ey sl�ould investigate the clearing and tlie development of <br />a more inte�isive use under ti�e B-4 zon�� to which t]Ze land is <br />no�� designated. iVe noted that if the city det�rmined it was <br />interested in a l�ur�n�l�e righi ckxvn u�:.t-i« land that we would get <br />in touch with them. <br />21) Lucan - 457-7235. RoUert i,ucan owns a house on the east side <br />of Asbury, t}iree lots soutl� of I3ren�ier at 3030 Nort}i Asbury. <br />Tliis is a 75 foot lot to tialtich l��e proposes to add a gara�e in <br />the front of the existing garage which he would t}aen convert <br />to livin� space. Ne ciid not liave accurate measurements of <br />ti�e existing front yard setback w}�icll ile tl�inks is �ubstantially <br />�reater than the reQuired 30 feet. llue to existing tree cover <br />it was difficult to determine from our air photos whetlier. the <br />ltomes are in fact 30 feet back or more. iVe suggested }ie det�rmine <br />tl�is ciistanc;e exactly, noting that it is tlie city's p�licy <br />to retain at least 20 feet in front of a garage so as to <br />accomodate tlie parking of a private veliicle on private property. <br />I�ie pi•oposes to c}leck out ttiese dir:�ensions and rhen consider <br />the possibility of a minor variance if appropriate. <br />22) Caregiet - 4S3-9731. Diane Caregiet lives az ;G1 riinnesota <br />and proposes an expansion to l�er home wliich would infringe <br />�0 faot rear yard requirement. 1Ve discussed procedures and <br />of a minor ��ariance application. <br />Av�nue <br />n the <br />appropriateness <br />