Laserfiche WebLink
� <br />�J <br />April 27, 1983 <br />Planning Office Hours <br />-4- <br />N <br />elson - 884-6604. Scott Nelson has a lo�t at the noo createcax�8�'�l0 �ontY <br />Ro da B and Oxford, and proposes to divide the land t <br />the north side. There is an existing 80' lot direWouldabe�96, gge•stWeesuggest <br />the east. The problem here is that the lot depth <br />tte t to deal with the neighbor to the west. to acqe forsthe 80'�llotnon <br />he a mp i t w as don <br />land to increase the depth. Th�.s is the waY <br />east side of Oxfoxd. If this can be accomplished, �hsideVsever llyeabs <br />the a ro ve d on tlle e as <br />similar to a previous lot division, pp <br />a o <br />14) <br />g . <br />ier - 484-2178. Joan Carrier lives at 1040 West County Road C-2 (southwest <br />15) Carr and ro oses to construct a porch on the east side <br />corner of C-2 and Oxford), P P ard. Oxford <br />of the home, which wouXd extend 14' into thTo�mately�l5) fur�her east than <br />5treet appears to have been construc�obably due to the terrain conditions in <br />would normally have been expected, p ar� on the east sirle of the <br />this area. Thus, visually, there would be ample y and suggesteu she <br />hoi.zse. We reviewed the minor variThee ro�osedrporchrwould appear to be an <br />discuss this with her neighbors. p p Lalify and process the minor <br />;. attractive addition to the house, if she can q� <br />`r variance under ihe minor variance procedures. <br />� <br />0 <br />� <br />� <br />16) <br />17) <br />Bolea - 733-4559. Phil Bolea has a single-famione1the�landeR-2rtdividectheer <br />of County Road C and Western. He proposes to <br />lot and build a duplex on the site. Th� lot �ifi�Cation135`y� Te iewedtpro�edure� <br />lot has previously f�een zoned to the R-2 class <br />and xequirements, suggesting he discuss the proposal with his neighbors prior <br />to filing an application for approval. <br />Grou W- 4�1-0677. Mark Matthews was in again to diSBoardsf�rlall5pyear period <br />P <br />the leasing of ihe ��SThechwould�propose toelease�the entire site on the <br />with a 10-year optlon. Y <br />condition that the City can utilize tlie rkedeabout leasing�a part of�theesite, <br />witl�.out payment. They had previously tal <br />an <br />d the School Board charging the City for the use o� �h�and thuderth� currentd. <br />We suggested this would be an inappropriate arrangeme , <br />P <br />roposal. They would utilize the entire strseduforf thetstoragetaf cableaand <br />during which time about 15,000 ft, would be u <br />e ui ment. This use would be processed as a specia foTS�heeusetof schooldest <br />impact" under tlie revisians enacted by the Counci <br />ro extie� in the City. We reviewed the site and building plans and conditi�ns <br />p p are rocessing the special <br />under which the building a��hdtbe °equ�rementsn. ey p <br />use permit in accordanc <br />The lease provides that after five years, the SchoT1stor�demayTheeGroup Wtpeople <br />all or a portion of the 15,000 sq. ft. only used fo g <br />suggest that by that time, they will lilc.ely have additional needs for tlle space, <br />and would liope to occupjr <br />it themselves. They feel very good abaut being able to <br />locate in this structure, inasmuch as it will bethleirfstudiosme�ffices,landave <br />had adequate space to do an appropri ate 7 ob for <br />P <br />rovisions for the community facilities required under the Cable TV franchise. <br />