Laserfiche WebLink
� <br />• <br />• <br />DATE: <br />T0: <br />FROM: <br />21 January 1991 <br />Steve Sarkozy <br />John Shardlow <br />MEMORANDUM <br />SUBJECT: PLANNING OFFICE HOURS, January 9, 1991 <br />1. Steve Embretson - 935-3906 <br />Mr. Embretson is one of several developers who have been putting <br />together various alternative development proposals for the <br />southern half of the Corpus Christi School property in the <br />southwest quadrant of County Road B and Fairview. Mr. Embretson <br />was in to review and discuss a potential single-family <br />residential plat that would be located parallel to the recently <br />developed single-family lots off of the extension of Skillman, <br />west of Fairview. All of the lots that were shown in the <br />preliminary plat conformed with the R-1 standards. <br />Much of the discussion with Mr. Embretson had to do with <br />technical issues related to the extension of the various city <br />utilities. There was some discussion about the need to evaluate <br />whether or not this potential new street would need to be <br />extended through to the west to provide ior east-west traffic <br />movements through this neighborhood. Obviously, this ques�ion <br />can only be addressed in the context of the school district's <br />future plans for the area south of the praperty that is currently <br />utilized for the Fairview Community Center. We su <br />Mr. Embretson contact the school district and discussgthisematter <br />with them. <br />2. Chris Clark - 535-0080 <br />Mr. Clark is an employee of Norwest �ank and he was in to review <br />the requirement� for signage on bank <br />bank that he was in �o review is locatedponptheiwest sideSofcRice <br />Street, north of Larpenteur Avenue. As it turns out, the <br />exist�ng signage on this faczl�ty greatly exceeds the amount of <br />wall signage currently permitted in the city code. We explained <br />to him that if they wanted anything close to the amount of <br />signage that was shown on his sketches, that a variance would <br />need to be approved. Frankly, we discouraged him from a 1 in <br />ior the variance saying that the amount of variance that�pwould <br />need to ve granted in order to ga forward with what he was <br />propo�ing was beyond what we felt the city could support, He <br />stated that ,he understood this, but that his supervisors at the <br />bank were asking him to get �opies of variance applications and <br />that it was his expectation that they would proceed with the <br />application. <br />