Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />M E M O R A N D U M <br />DATE: July 16, 1990 <br />TO: Steve Sarkozy <br />FROM: John Shardlow <br />SUBJECT: PLANNING OFFICE HOURS, June 27, 1990 <br />1. Hurley (333-1663) <br />Tom Hurley, his architect and contractor were in to present and <br />discuss their proposal for accommodating FINA signage at the <br />Lexington Shoppes Shopping Center. Last week, they presented a <br />revised site plan and conceptual elevations for the canopy. The <br />modified site plan illustrated a canopy redu�ed in size, which <br />conformed with all applicable setbacks. Z�i�e architectural <br />detailing of the canopy had not been worked out at that time and <br />that is what they returned to discuss this morning. <br />The proposed plans for the canopy call for the band alon� the <br />face of the roof to match the material of the sign band on the <br />main building. This is a drivet (industrial strength stucco) <br />that will wrap around under the cano�y as well. The dark metal <br />band along the roof line of the center has to be carried t�rough <br />� to the canopy as well. The posts supportinq the canopy ar� to <br />match bot� the calor and the style l.ines of the main center. All <br />of these elemen�s are appropriate and will serve to tie the <br />canopy architecture to the main building. <br />There is an issue related to signage for the FINA station. The <br />center dev�lopers had assumed that the FINA name and racing <br />st:ipes could be located on the ca�opy. They proceeded on this <br />assu�ption and represented this to FINA in their negatiations. <br />W�en they began to discuss the plans for the building permit for <br />the aanopy, they were informed that Roseville did not permit <br />signaqe on canopies. They re�orted this information to �INA �nd <br />this prompted FINA to request a pylon sign to identify their <br />business. <br />The praposed pylon would conform to all code requirement�, but, <br />it was not shown on the �pproved planned uni� dev�lopment site <br />plan. This will require an amendment to the conditional use <br />permit for the site plan and it will need to be reviewed by the <br />Planning Commissio� and City Council. <br />The City has allowed other service stations to put architQctural <br />detailing, stripes, etc. on canopies. It is already the intent <br />to allow FINA to �ut their r��i�� st�ipes on th� canopy and it <br />could be argued that it would be a n�t benefit to the �ity to <br />simply allow FINA to be identified on the canopy and avaid �he <br />� need for a pylon sign to identify this business. This do4s rais� <br />the issue of setting a precedent with respect to signage on <br />