Correspondence 1989-1990 Jopke - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

a. • ryu` � U EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE * * * * * * * � * * Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota was duly held on the 8th day of January -, 1990, at 7:30 p.m. The following members were present: Johnson, Thomas, Cushman, Maschka, and Rog, and the following were absent: Ncne. Member Johnson introduced the following resol.ution and moved its adaption: RESOLUTION NO. �529 RESOLUTION REQUESTING ONE YEAR E�{TENSION OF DUE DATE FOR REVIEW OF ° THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE'S COMPREHENSIVE �LAN �OR CONSISTENGY WI�H AMENDED METR4POLITAN COUNCIL POLiCY PLANS WHEREAS, state statutes (Minn. S�kat. 473.856� requires tha� cities review their comprehensive �lans for con�istex�cy with Me�ropolftan Council p�Yicy plans within nine mon�th� of the plans being submit�eci to the City; and � WFiEREAS, the Metropolitan Cauncil has amenc�ed its policy plans; a�nd WHEREAS, the City og Rosevill�e is required t� review its comprehens�ve plan for consistency with th� amende�i po].icy plans and submit amendments to the Metrop�litan Council by January 10, 1990; and WHEREAS, the City af Roseville has scl�edul�d and budgeted for a major r�view and upda�e o� its cotnpzehensive pl,an in 1990. I�OW, `�HEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Rosevil].e regues�s that the Me�ropolitan Coun�il qrant the Ci�y o� Raseville a one year extension tQ the deadline to review its comprehensive plan for consistency �rith the amended Metro�olitan Council p�li�r �lans and submit any necessary plan am�ndanent� for review. The motion tor the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly secand�d by Member Maschka , and upan a vc�te being taken thQreon, ths followinc� uoted in favor thereog: Johnson, Tt�oma�, G��hman, Maschka, and Roc�, and the fo].lowing voted against the sam�: None, W�IEREUPON said resolution was d�clared duly passed and adopted. �