Correspondence 1989-1990 Jopke - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

, u � to be prepared by a registered architect or engineer, except in cases where unusual structural meLhods are proposed. 13.430. Noise, Smoke, Toxic Matter, Odors� Vibrations, Glare or Heat, and Explosives. (Performance Standards relating to smoke, toxic matter, odors, vibrations, glare or heat, and explosives, should be moved from the industrial Section 10.170 through Section 10.230 to this section under Performance Standards so as to be applicable to all zones rather than the Industrial District only. The Ordinance as currently written, makes these standards applicable to the industrial area only. Where such problems usually e�xist, though they may well occur in other zones as well -- particularly business zones.) IV. POLICIES TO ESTABLISH THRESHOLDS FOF� RE�UIRING SITE PLAN REVIEW, CONCRETE CURBIf�1G AND _ D►RAINAGE, AND _RIGHT_ OF-1NAY DEDICATION �' -' A. SITE PLAN REVIEW The Planning Commission recommends that a threshold of anything more than 10 percent of an expansion of a� building or an expenditure equal t� or above 20 percent of the assessor's rnarket value of th� property (land and buildings) would meet a threshold wherein a Special Use PermiC for site plan review would be required. A 50 percent expansion of a building and/or a SO percent increase of value would require meeting alt development design criteria �s stipulated in the P'erformance Standards section of the Ordinance. A percentage of building expansion between 10 and 50 percent and/or a monetary improvement between 20 percent and 50 percent would require a proporrional level of improvement in all design areas as may be Qroposed in a submission for site plan review, subject to review by the City Planning Commission and approval by the City Council. � Such a policy sets a minimum under which nn pian revi�w is required, sets a maximum for fulli compliance, and yet provides a degree of flexibility for those areas in between. In the process of preparing th� application, meetings wilfl be conducted with the Staff who wil! encourage the �pplicant to improve the property and conform to th� requirements as much as may be reason�ble. The finai decision as to such apprapriateness �ill be left to the Planning Cornmission and Cou�cil. 8. CONCRETE CURDIf�G AND DR�INAGE As recommended by Steve Gatlin in Appendix 1, the Planning Cammissio� recommends the following set of criteria for considering when parking lot curbing and drainage is required. 1. Concrete parking lo greater) of curb and proper setbacks will be requireci if the t is regraded or reconstructed with a�-inch lift (or bituminous pavernent.