Laserfiche WebLink
P' M1Y <br />• <br />C <br />r � <br />LJ <br />1. <br />2. <br />3. <br />4. <br />5. <br />6. <br />7. <br />May 1984: <br />N�v. 1984: <br />May 1985: <br />Sept. 1986: <br />March 1987: <br />March 1988: <br />April 1988 <br />A: City approv�s minor variance to expand a <br />one-story single garage to a two car <br />garage with living space above and a new <br />en�ry way. Garage can be within 3 feet <br />of side property line and within 16 feet <br />of front property line. <br />B: Variance for deck and walkway within 6 <br />inches of property line denied. <br />C: Shoreline permit granted. <br />A: <br />A: <br />6 month extension granted. <br />Variance expires. <br />A: City approves same variance as in May <br />1984. Larson signed plan. <br />B: City approved a shoreline permit for <br />house setback 22 feet from lakeshore. <br />A: City issues building permit for <br />construction as per approved minor <br />variance. <br />A: City issues permit to connect garage <br />f oundation with porch foundation, <br />install new foundation to repair damage <br />caused by tree and to install new <br />windows and roof over old house. Plans <br />�n file not dated. Not clear what plan <br />permit was issued for. Plans show house <br />expansion towards side property line. <br />B: Mr. Larson complains about bay window <br />and window is replaced with flush <br />window. <br />A: Mr. Larson expresses concerns about <br />construction. <br />B: Staff determines that an additional <br />variance will be necessary for house <br />expansion within 3 feet of side property <br />line. <br />C: Meeting held with Dahlgren, Larson, <br />Rekuski, Beseth, and Jopke. Larson <br />agrees to support minor variance if Mr. <br />Rekuski completes 8 items. Larson <br />agrees that Rekuski should no� remove <br />portion of house. <br />