Laserfiche WebLink
� <br />• <br />� <br />DATE: <br />TO: <br />FROM: <br />SIIBJECT: <br />M E M O R A N D U M <br />October 14, 1988 <br />Craig <br />Rick �� <br />Permit Review Process <br />There recently have been two cases which have brought to light <br />problems with our permit review systemo The following are the <br />problem areas I have observed: <br />1, proper plans including site plans are not being required or ' <br />provided in all cases. <br />2. In some cases, plans have not been dated or re�erenced on <br />permits to allow proper tracking of construction projects. <br />3, Inspection records zncomplete in some cases. <br />4, Inspectors may have not noted a potential problem because <br />they were there to do an inspection of another item. <br />5. <br />6. <br />Final inspections completed and Certificate of Occupancies <br />issued without checking for items required as part of zoning <br />approvals. <br />There is con�fusion about shoreline ordinance requirements <br />and procedure:s, especially if variances a�z involved. <br />I want to emphasize that the above items do not occur with every <br />permit application. In most cases, they are the exception not <br />the rule. � <br />To avoid these problems in the future, the following actions will <br />be taken: <br />1. Complete plans will be required before permi�s will be <br />issued. <br />2. Gordy and I will both review and sign off on permit <br />applications before permitsfo�erevi w ing applications.aside <br />8: 0 0 A M t o 8: 3 0 A N i e a c h d a y <br />3, When permits are issued, pontinuel to bnote tplans das eapproved <br />on the permit. We wil <br />and to put the permit number on the approved plans. <br />4. Completed inspection records will be kept. A more efficient <br />� method of recording inspections on building cards will be <br />developed. <br />