Laserfiche WebLink
� <br />DATE: <br />TO: <br />FROM: <br />SUBJECT: <br />M� M O R A N D U M <br />July zs, is8s <br />Craig A. Wa.lclron <br />Rick Jopke � <br />Analysis of Petition requesting rezoning of Reiling <br />site to R�1. <br />After reviewing the pe�itior� which was submitted concerning tlhe <br />Reiling site, I have discovered that there is, in fact, two - <br />petitions . One pe�tition covers the nor�thern portio� of the s�.te <br />and the oth�r coyers tha southern portion of the sita. <br />I have r�eview�d the petitions and h�ve determined that all the <br />signaiures appear to be valid based Qn the Official I2amsey �otanty <br />Abstract af TitlP. There a�e signatures ai owners of 1.8 of �he <br />24 propertie� which immediately abu�t th� property as describe�d on <br />�.he petitions. This is 75%. This percentage exceeds the 50% <br />required by ordinance. Therefore, I conclude that it is a valid <br />pe�itic�n which should be brought to the Council for referral to <br />the Planning C�mmission. <br />I called Leslie Berr�r about the petition and about the fac�t that <br />� the �ioratorium was not in place. She referred me to Larry Bieza <br />�nd Marilyn Piersdlorf . I have talked to Marilyn Piex�sdorf �and <br />Larry Bieza and let them know we need to have the application and <br />fee to have the council conside� the petitions. I also informed <br />them that the moratorium is not in place. They have subsequently <br />completed and filed the app�.ication and paid the application fee. <br />� <br />� <br />