My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Correspondence 1988 Jopke
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
1983-1993 Correspondance and Office Hours Records
>
Correspondence 1988 Jopke
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/17/2016 4:12:25 PM
Creation date
2/9/2016 1:00:13 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
266
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
C� <br />� <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DATE: <br />ITEM <br />10-24�-88 <br />NO . : —� <br />Department Approval: Manager Reviewed: <br />Agenda Section: <br />Hearings <br />Item Description: Bru�tger Companies request for a comprehensive <br />plan change from school to h1gY� densi�y <br />residential and low density residential, a <br />rezoning from R-1 to R-3A, special use permit <br />for a plar�ned unit development, and a <br />pr�eliminary plat at 2400 North Dale St. <br />The Roseville Planning Commission at its October 12, 1988 meeting, <br />on a 6-1 vote recommended denial of the proposed change in the <br />comprehensive plan from school to high density residential and low <br />density residential based on the following: <br />1� The proposal does not clearly address or resolve water <br />•pressure and fire protection problems. <br />2. <br />3. <br />4. <br />The traffic generated from the project will adversely affect <br />traffic �conditions on adjacent roads. <br />fihe traf�ic volumes will affect the safety of children <br />walking� to Central Par]c Elementary S�hool. <br />The project wa� subject to extensive neighborhood opposition. <br />�• The issue of the City purchase of the school and ten acr�s <br />for a Recreation Genter should be separated compl�tely from <br />tl�e housir�g projecte <br />6• The proposed density of development is inconsistent with the <br />surrounding neighborhood. <br />The Roseville Planning Commissi�n recommended denial of the <br />requested rezonia�g from R-1 to R-3A based on the following: <br />1. <br />2. <br />The propos�l does not clearly address o� resolve water <br />pressure �nd fire protection problems. <br />The traffic gene:rated from the projec� will adversely affect <br />traffic condi.tions on adjacent roads. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.