My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Correspondence 1988 Jopke
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
1983-1993 Correspondance and Office Hours Records
>
Correspondence 1988 Jopke
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/17/2016 4:12:25 PM
Creation date
2/9/2016 1:00:13 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
266
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� <br />. , <br />/ • �� �' <br />,i �.�.c� � �' 1 -' " ..✓ <br />� <br />J � <br />Plaintiff was not given notice that rhis matter would be addres�ed �;� <br />at the August 10 Council meeting; <br />C�� <br />2. Th�� matter wa�s not properly scheduled on the agenda, but was simply <br />addre�sed at the Council �e�tin�, so that �ven had Plainti€f or her counsel <br />contacted the City of Rosevil��e, they would have been told that th� matter was <br />� not scheduled to be heard at the August 10 Council meeting; <br />3. That Plaintiff believes nothi.ng was indicated to the City Council <br />n <br />� <br />by either the aetorney for the CiGy of Roseville or the building inspector nf <br />P1ainCiff'e clai�n of own�rship of L-he Occupier� Property, aithough both parties <br />were aware of Plaintiff's i�nterest; ' <br />4„ 7�hat the City Council approved a set back f rom th� northeasterly <br />lot line of Lot 18, as claimed to be owned by Defendants Wood, withouC knc+wledge <br />of Plaintiff's claim of ownership to a portion of that property; <br />5. That the six (6) foot set back approved by the City Council <br />me�sure� to thp southwesterly edge of Plaintiff's row of trees; and if <br />excavation takes place, Plaintiff believes it will destroy her trees and <br />significantly depreciate the value of her home; and if the home is c�nstructed <br />as ralled for in the plans submitted by Wood and as appr.oved by the City, it <br />t�iil be tantamount to a zero foot set back from what Plaintiff believes to be <br />he� southwesterly property line; and <br />6. That the plans submitted by Defendants Wood indicated twelve (Z2) <br />to fourteen �14) feet between Che house and the north�asterly line �f Lot 19, <br />indicating that the�e is ample room for Defendants Wood to shift the location of <br />the house southw�sterly, away f rom what Pl��in[iff claims to be her souChwesterly <br />property �ine. <br />— - - - � . _.._..� <br />—5� <br />� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.