My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Correspondence 1992-1993 Waldron
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
1983-1993 Correspondance and Office Hours Records
>
Correspondence 1992-1993 Waldron
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/18/2016 9:02:57 AM
Creation date
2/9/2016 1:08:31 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
603
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Most evaluations conclude that state and local business financing efforts to sdmulate <br />economic development in distressed areas outside big cities have little influence on either the <br />level or th►: distribudon of economic growth. The studies show that programs without <br />s ific geographic targets are used disproportionately by businesses in grov;�ng areas of a <br />P� <br />state rather than in distressed areas, but have no measura.ble effects on the growth of the <br />� <br />state economy. Programs aimed at specific distressed geographic areas show almost no <br />. ; <br />effects on the growth of these areas.' <br />The evaluations leave ec:onomic development planners and policy makers without <br />insight about why programs have no effects or what they should do to make programs more <br />successful in encouraging growth in distressed areas--the programs' explicit aim. <br />Where the � <br />. <br />evaluadons do offer policy dir�don, the recommendations reflect primarily the framework of <br />neoclassical economic theory. BeGause these programs seek to influence economic activity, <br />such recommendadons are useful. However, programs that sta.te and local government <br />officials implement are political as well as economic, and programmatic changes that are <br />likely to have the most effects on program outcomes must emerge from understanding ihe <br />political economy of �rograms, not just their economics. <br />This paper draws on a study of a�n economic develvpment program, Minnesota's <br />Small Cities Economic Develt,prr►�i�t Progtam, to assess thrze gussiLle �xplanations f�r the <br />poor results of state and local programs to stinnulate the economies of distr�ssed ar�s. 5ta�te <br />`M�rgaret E: llewar, "'!'ax incCnrives aad Pd�lic Loans and Subsidies: W�i I�i�crenrx Dc�'1'hay I�iaic� in <br />Hill, and Sammis B. 'Whiie, <br />Nonmetropolitan Economic Development?" in Richard D. �iingham+ �:d�'�'� �• . <br />eds,� Financine Eronomic Develonment (Newburg� Paric, CA: Sage, 1990y. Exc,cptions oxist when ti�� at� <br />designated as distres.sed is so smeli rhat a program caa influeace a deCision to locate or expand on one ssdo of a <br />border rather thaa another �ad therefore caa produce �. eff�t on the distres.�od strea. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.