My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016-02-23_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
201x
>
2016
>
2016-02-23_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/18/2016 1:51:13 PM
Creation date
2/18/2016 1:33:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
2/23/2016
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
203
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
812 Chair Stenlund opined that one benefit of revenue sharing was the interaction it <br />813 provided between vendors and the city, through presentation of their annual work <br />814 plan and services they volunteered to provide (e.g. industrial services or more bins <br />815 in the park) and the incentive it represented. <br />816 <br />817 Member Cihacek noted that could be required without making it related to <br />818 revenue sharing. <br />819 <br />820 Discussion ensued about the timing for continued discussion of the RFP process, <br />821 impacts in delaying further discussion based on the C' Council's deliberation <br />822 and authorization, with staff anticipating an Apr* 6 release of the RFP; and <br />823 desire of staff to have the PWETC's input to the City Council deliberation. <br />824 <br />825 Member Cihacek asked Mr. Johnson to provide copies of his slide presentation to <br />826 the PWETC allowing for additional ideas and questions to staff before the next <br />827 discussion. <br />828 <br />829 Mr. Culver suggested tabling discussion to a future meeting an low the City <br />830 of St. Paul to complete their RFP process. Mr. Culver also reporte f had <br />831 posted questions about recycling on Speak Up! Roseville earlier this eek; and <br />832 that information would also be available at the February meeting, and perhaps <br />833 include some ideas from Roseville residents on the recycling program. In his <br />834 brief review of the site prior to tonight's meeting, Mr. Culver reported that he was <br />835 amazed at the number of responses in less than 24-hours; and noted he would <br />836 anticipate additional public input at the next meeting as well. <br />837 <br />838 Motion <br />839 Cihacek moved, Wozniak seconded, TABLING this discussion and the PWETC's <br />840 recommendation to the City Council to the February 2016 PWETC meeting. <br />841 <br />842 1kAyes:7 <br />843 Nays:0 <br />844 Motion carried\ . <br />845 <br />846 8. Possible Items for Next Meeting — February 23, 2016 <br />847 Member Lenz announced that she would not be present for the February meeting. <br />848 11 <br />849 Items identifiedWr the February agenda included: <br />850 • MS4 discussion (Stenlund) <br />851 • Recycling RFP continued discussion and recommendation to the City Council <br />852 • Lake Owasso private drive storm sewer project— possible assessment <br />853 • Update on MnDot projects (e.g. managed lane between Highway 36 and <br />854 Lexington Avenue) — February agenda or deferred as time allows <br />855 • Twin Lakes Parkway east collector project update <br />Page 19 of 20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.