Laserfiche WebLink
<br />EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City <br />Council of the City of Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota was duly <br />held on the 22nd day of January, 1990, at 7:30 p.m. <br /> <br />The following members were present: Johnson, Thomas, Cushman, <br />Maschka, and Rog, and the following were absent: None. <br /> <br />Member Johnson introduced the following resolution and moved its <br />adoption: <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. 8534 <br /> <br />RESOLUTION TO RAMSEY COUNTY BOARD <br />RECOMMENDING TAX INCREMENT FINANCING <br /> <br />WHEREAS, Tax Increment Financing has been a critical redevelopment <br />tool for first ring suburbs such as Roseville; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, through the reduction of state and federal development funds <br />Tax Increment Financing, in many situations, is the only remaining <br />tool for cities; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, Tax Increment Financing has been critical to the City in <br />leveraging $146 million in new investment and 2,800 jobs; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, Tax Increment Financing has been used in critical projects in <br />collaboration with the County's Community Development Block Grant <br />Program for redevelopment projects such as the Byerly's project; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, Roseville has been a trucking center that is currently in a <br />major transition, based on substantial changes in the trucking <br />industry; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, Ramsey County has developed a Tax Increment Financing Report <br />that does not properly depict the true benefits of tax increment <br />financing; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, Ramsey County is considering a policy to place caps on tax <br />increment and limit pooling activities; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, said limits on caps and pooling would drive proposed develop- <br />ments out of Roseville, based on the extensive costs of redevelopment; <br /> <br />NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Roseville is opposed <br />to any caps and pooling restrictions relating to tax increment. <br /> <br />BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the effectuation of said caps and pooling <br />would completely eliminate future redevelopment efforts in the city <br />such as the 200 acre Twin Lakes area in which the County has been <br />extensively involved with the city in its redevelopment activities. <br />