My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016-01-26_PWETC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
201x
>
2016
>
2016-01-26_PWETC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/24/2016 8:07:20 AM
Creation date
2/24/2016 8:05:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
1/26/2016
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
At the request of Member Seigler, Mr. Johnson advised that recycling containers <br />were needed more than just in shelters, but were more heavily used along <br />pathways for bottles and cans; as well as a lot of use in other areas of parks. <br />Member Lenz agreed with the differences in parks and uses (e.g. Acorn Park <br />compared with other parks) and suggested the Parks & Recreation Department <br />should make the determination on where best to aggregate materials. <br />Mr. Johnson responded that that would be a definite option once the numbers <br />were determined; and in response to Member Cihacek confirmed that some would <br />chose to aggregate while others would be kept individually. <br />Member Wozniak advised that Ramsey County would purchase containers for <br />municipal park recyclables. <br />Mr. Johnson advised that more detail would come up under each park name, and a <br />total number of carts needed; whether receptacles were provided in a parking lot, <br />building, field, or how many along a pathway; and the frequency for service. <br />In response to Member Wozniak, Mr. Johnson advised that the type of cart or <br />receptacle would be open to vendor preference or discretion as recommended <br />whenever feasible. Specific to evidence of contamination of materials, Mr. <br />Johnson advised that Eureka hadn't brought up any issues or concerns to staff to - <br />date. <br />At the request of Chair Stenlund, Mr. Johnson confirmed that this REP and bid <br />process will be using the value-added system. <br />Curbside Collection of Residential Organics - Section 5.05 (Pages 18-19) <br />Mr. Johnson clarified that this would be a bid option for organics in an effort to <br />plan ahead, even though Ramsey County couldn't push citywide organic <br />collection in 2017 as originally planned. <br />At the request of Member Cihacek as to the progress by the City of St. Paul in <br />their organic collection efforts, Mr. Johnson responded that they would be rolling <br />on organic collection neat year; and the City of Roseville was awaiting St. Paul's <br />award to use as a model and to inform Roseville's process and potential cost <br />proj ections. <br />Member Cihacek observed that it was easier to develop an economy of scale on <br />routes with neighboring communities with a larger regional area. <br />Mr. Johnson noted that the City of Minneapolis was already doing that and <br />suggested it may prove the best case for Roseville with St. Paul leading the <br />charge; anticipating that given the number of residents a push for organic <br />Page 15 of 20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.