My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016-01-26_PWETC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
201x
>
2016
>
2016-01-26_PWETC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/24/2016 8:07:20 AM
Creation date
2/24/2016 8:05:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
1/26/2016
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chair Stenlund opined that one benefit of revenue sharing was the interaction it <br />provided between vendors and the city, through presentation of their annual work <br />plan and services they volunteered to provide (e.g. industrial services or more bins <br />in the park) and the incentive it represented. <br />Member Cihacek noted that could be required without making it related to <br />revenue sharing. <br />Discussion ensued about the timing for continued discussion of the RFP process, <br />impacts in delaying further discussion based on the City Council's deliberation <br />and authorization, with staff anticipating an April 1, 2016 release of the RFP; and <br />desire of staff to have the PWETC's input to inform the City Council deliberation. <br />Member Cihacek asked Mr. Johnson to provide copies of his slide presentation to <br />the PWETC allowing for additional ideas and questions to staff before the next <br />discussion. <br />Mr. Culver suggested tabling discussion to a future meeting and to allow the City <br />of St. Paul to complete their RFP process. Mr. Culver also reported staff had <br />posted questions about recycling on Speak Up! Roseville earlier this week; and <br />that information would also be available at the February meeting, and perhaps <br />include some ideas from Roseville residents on the recycling program. In his <br />brief review of the site prior to tonight's meeting, Mr. Culver reported that he was <br />amazed at the number of responses in less than 24 -hours; and noted he would <br />anticipate additional public input at the next meeting as well. <br />Motion <br />Cihacek moved, Wozniak seconded, TABLING this discussion and the PWETC's <br />recommendation to the City Council to the February 2016 PWETC meeting. <br />Ayes: 7 <br />Nays: 0 <br />Motion carried. <br />8. Possible Items for Next Meeting — February 23, 2016 <br />Member Lenz announced that she would not be present for the February meeting. <br />Items identified for the February agenda included: <br />• MS4 discussion (Stenlund) <br />• Recycling RFP continued discussion and recommendation to the City Council <br />• Lake Owasso private drive storm sewer project—possible assessment <br />• Update on MnDot projects (e.g. managed lane between Highway 36 and <br />Lexington Avenue) — February agenda or deferred as time allows <br />• Twin Lakes Parkway east collector project update <br />Page 19 of 20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.