My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016-01-26_PWETC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
201x
>
2016
>
2016-01-26_PWETC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/24/2016 8:07:20 AM
Creation date
2/24/2016 8:05:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
1/26/2016
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Culver reported on a new business to Roseville, Calyxt, recently granted a <br />Conditional Use in the Twin Lakes area for their new corporate office <br />headquarters, greenhouses, and outdoor test plots. Mr. Culver advised that this <br />was a unique company developing seeds; and one of the conditions of approval of <br />interest to the PWETC was that they not allow drainage directly into Langton <br />Lake. Mr. Culver noted that any site clean-up of hazardous waste found on the <br />site or soil contamination concerns would be addressed as part of the Tax <br />Increment Financing hazardous Waste Fund. <br />5. 2016 Work Plan <br />Mr. Culver advised that this work plan had been presented to the City Council at <br />their last January 2016 meeting; and deferred to Assistant Director Jesse <br />Freihammer to present the PWETC with a summary of 2015 projects and <br />accomplishments, along with 2016 proposed projects as displayed on respective <br />maps and as detailed in the staff report. <br />At the request of Member Wozniak, Mr. Culver clarified that, while a roundabout <br />versus a signal had initially been discussed at Fairview Avenue, it had been <br />determined that due to its cost of 2 to 3 times higher than a signal installation, and <br />since it was the final link configuration north of there, it was easier to install a <br />signal. <br />At the request of Member Cihacek, Mr. Culver advised that it was too early to <br />make a determination on the delamination issues and impacts of sealcoating <br />materials. However, Mr. Culver reported that it was becoming more suspicious <br />that the sealcoating materials and oil may be the culprit, but since several different <br />iterations of oil types had been used through the course of issues, it was hard to <br />nail down the actual contributing factor and whether or not it remains <br />problematic. Mr. Culver advised that, while continuing to observe the situation, it <br />was interesting to note the parking lot stripping had not been evidenced even <br />though it was the same material as used on streets but without the same load even <br />though they experienced significant traffic as well. With inconclusive data do - <br />date, Mr. Culver advised that he was not confident enough to restart the <br />sealcoating program in 2016; and confirmed for Member Cihacek that sealcoat <br />funds would continue to be allocated to other mill and overlay projects in the <br />interim. <br />At the request of Member Cihacek, Mr. Culver reported that the lifespan of lift <br />stations was dependent on the type of equipment (e.g. pumps and controls) and <br />their overall design. <br />Mr. Freihammer continued his report on other agency projects scheduled for <br />2016, including those of MnDOT, Ramsey County, the Metropolitan Council <br />environmental Services, and area watershed districts that involved work in or <br />around Roseville. <br />Page 3 of 20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.