My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016-01-26_PWETC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
201x
>
2016
>
2016-01-26_PWETC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/24/2016 8:07:20 AM
Creation date
2/24/2016 8:05:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
1/26/2016
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
comprehensive plan update) were not listed on the work plan, but deserved and <br />would be receiving recognition as well over the next year. <br />In conclusion, Mr. Freihammer reviewed the upcoming project by the <br />Metropolitan Council Environmental Services at Upper Villa Park, providing <br />photos and maps for this deep pipe and the City of Roseville's water main <br />replacement in conjunction with that project. <br />Mr. Culver reported that there would be impacts to Upper Villa Park related to <br />trees and vegetation, and noted the Public Works Department would work with <br />the Parks & Recreation Department to minimize those impacts, noting that the <br />line could not be moved, only rehabilitated. <br />6. Skating Center Solar Project <br />Mr. Culver provided an update since the November 2015 PWETC meeting when <br />last discussed, seeking a final recommendation from the PWETC for the City <br />Council. <br />Mr. Culver reported that not much had changed from that last presentation with <br />staff meeting during the interim with the Power Purchaser and negotiating a <br />purchase Agreement, as well as meeting with the Tax Equity Partner who will be <br />the owner of the system and provide financing for the system. Mr. Culver advised <br />that the financier was Kenyon Energy, an owner of installations nationwide. Even <br />though this installation is smaller than their typical installation, Mr. Culver <br />advised that they were doing a larger installation in this area (Brooklyn Park, MN) <br />and decided this would be a good add-on project and under their same umbrella. <br />Mr. Culver advised that, after staffs discussion with Kenyon about what would <br />happen if the City purchased the system and took on its maintenance and <br />ownership, and seeking more detailed information on the lifecycle of the solar <br />panels and other equipment, Kenyon admitted that they experienced few public or <br />private partners exercising a buyout option because of the added operational costs, <br />unknowns with maintenance an operation, and what to do at the end of the <br />system's life. <br />Mr. Culver further reported that the City Council had expressed their concern <br />about adding something else to the CIP program, unknown replacement costs and <br />operation/maintenance dollars. Mr. Culver noted that the City could maintain the <br />agreement, written for twenty years, with a small inflation escalator increasing <br />payback incrementally; and expressed confidence that capacity credits from Neel <br />Energy would be realized for producing excess solar energy, but unsure if that <br />capacity credit would increase over time with inflation or remain a constant over <br />that twenty-year term or if the credit would last for the full twenty years. Mr. <br />Culver noted these remained unknown questions at the time of this report. <br />Page 5 of 20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.