Variance Board Resolution_105 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE VARIANCE BOARD OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the Variance Board of the City of Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota, was held on the 9`h day of July 2014, at 5:30 p.m. The following members were present: Chair Michael Boguszewski; and Board Members Robert Murphy and Shannon Cunningham; and none were absent. Variance Board Member Boguszewski introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: VB RESOLUTION NO. 105 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE TO §1004.02 (ACCESSORY BUILDINGS) OF THE ROSEVILLE CITY CODE AT 2926 OLD HIGHWAY 8 (PF14-015) WHEREAS, the subject property is legally described as: PI N: OS-29-23-23-0058 That part of the Northwest Quarter of Section 5, Township 29 North, Range 23 West, described as follows: Beginning at a point in the center line of United States Highway No. 8 (formerly known as State Highway No. 63), distant 540 feet Northeasterly measured along said center line of Highway No. 8 from the South line of said Northwest Quarter; thence continuing Northeasterly along said center line a distance of 91 feet; thence Southeasterly at right angles a distance of 290.4 feet; thence Southwesterly at right angles a distance of 91 feet; thence Northwesterly at right angles a distance of 290.4 feet to the point of beginning. Subject to high��ay over the Northwesterly 40 feet thereof. Ramsey County, Minnesota WHEREAS, City Code § 1004.02 would limit the area of detached accessory storage structures to 85% of the footprint of the principal structure, or 693 square feet; and WHEREAS, the owner of the subject property, has requested a VARIANCE to City Code § 1004.02 to allow a proposed detached garage to exceed the area limit; and WHEREAS, City Code § 1009.04 (Variances) establishes the purpose of a vAR�A1vcE is "to permit adjustment to the zoning regulations where there are practical difficulties applying to a parcel of land or building that prevent the property from being used to the extent intended by the zoning;" and WHEREAS, the Variance Board has made the following findings: a. The practical difficulty stems from the fact that the only code-compliant way to build an adequately-sized garage would be to attach it to the home but, since the home was �. ,