Laserfiche WebLink
669 <br />Also, Chair Stenlund suggested fine-tuning language related to appropriate terms <br />670 <br />and expectations for universal clean-up of spills or leaks that may end up in the <br />671 <br />city's gutter lines by defining what they meant by "clean-up, including how and <br />672 <br />when they would address those spills. Chair Stenlund noted that this area tied <br />673 <br />directly to the City's MS4 permit. <br />674 <br />675 <br />Chair Stenlund also suggested clear language that the contactor, their employees, <br />676 <br />or subcontractors did not smoke in garages; and wherever "No Smoking" signs <br />677 <br />are in evidence, they comply with that. <br />678 <br />Ask <br />679 <br />Specific to collection zones, Chair Stenlund reiterated the potential dividing of the <br />680 <br />park zone; and asked that staff review the draft RFP for areas or zoned (Section <br />681 <br />5.08) to make it clearer. <br />682 <br />683 Chair Stenlund noted the need to spell out MRF the first time it was used in the <br />684 draft RFP. <br />685 <br />686 Chair Stenlund expressed his appreciation that the annualNthatof <br />ions to the <br />687 City Council come through the vendor and PWETC to fun actions <br />688 taken by a vendor to reduce their carbon footprint as well as the city; and <br />689 as a way to inform future best management practices. <br />690 <br />691 To that point, Mr. Culver noted that the best part of the Best Value Process <br />692 scoring was recognizing those additional standards proposed by a vendor and <br />693 rewarding them for those extra efforts. <br />694 qW <br />695 Section 6.07 — Annual Work Plan (page 28) <br />696 Chair Stenlund opined that he found the first sentence somewhat awkward, and <br />697 asked that staff review that as well as Section 6.08 (Outreach to Low Participating <br />698 Communities) to make sure there was consistency in what was being addressed. <br />699 Chair Stenlund noted in Section 6.08 specifically the need to be consistent with <br />700 the terminology of "Best Value Plan," Value Added Plan," or "Best Value <br />701 Process" throughout the RFP. <br />702 <br />703 <br />Chair Stenlund also noted the reference to the "annual work plan" in Sections <br />704 <br />6.07, 6.08 and 6.09 needing consistency as well. <br />705 <br />706 <br />In Section 7.0V—rocessing Facilities Must Be Specified (page 28), Chair <br />707 <br />Stenlund again asked that MRF be spelled out the first time it was referenced. <br />708 <br />709 <br />Chair Stenlund noted the changes made by staff in Section 8.05 — Liquidated <br />710 <br />Damages (page 34 — 35) based on Member Cihacek's comments at the last <br />711 <br />meeting and whether that language was clearer. <br />712 <br />Page 16 of 20 <br />