My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Variance Board Resolution 89
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Variance Board
>
Resolutions
>
Variance Board Resolution 89
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2016 1:07:50 PM
Creation date
3/21/2016 1:07:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Variance Board
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Resolutions
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE <br />VARIANCE BOARD OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the Variance Board of the City of <br />th <br />Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota, was held on the 6 day of October 2010, at 5:30 p.m. <br />The following members were present: Members Best and Gisselquist; and <br />Chair Boerigter was absent. <br />Variance Board Member Best introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />VB RESOLUTION NO. 89 <br />A RESOLUTION DENYING VARIANCES TO §1004.16 (RESIDENTIAL SETBACKS) <br />OF THE ROSEVILLE CITY CODE AT 1015 JUDITH AVENUE (PF07-030) <br />WHEREAS, the property owner, William Rodrique, has requested variances to City Code <br />§1004.16 to allow principal structure encroachments into the required setbacks from street rights- <br />of-way; and <br />WHEREAS, the Variance Board has found that the existing residential dwelling <br />represents reasonable use of the property under the official zoning controls as anticipated by <br />State Statute and, therefore, that hardships are not present as required for the grant of a variance <br />from the strict requirements of the Roseville City Code; <br />NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Roseville Variance Board, to deny the <br />requested variances. <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Variance <br />Board Member Gisselquist and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor: <br />Members Best and Gisselquist; <br />and none voted against; <br />WHEREUPON said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. <br />Page 1 of 2 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.